In this case, Haidilao thinks Haidilao restaurant is used? River bottom fishing? Logo is approved and registered by Haidilao Company? Haidilao? Trademark similarity, which constitutes the use of similar trademarks in the same service and the use of Hedi old restaurant in its business premises? River bottom fishing? Trademark is a typical trademark use behavior in hotel service industry, which constitutes an infringement of using similar trademarks on the same service. Haidilao? The exclusive right to use a trademark, and asked Haidilao restaurant to immediately stop the infringement and compensate the economic loss of 200,000 yuan. Haidilao, for long-term consideration, even if the two brands are not related, Haidilao is not advertised and sold in the name of Haidilao, so it is only a name, which may cause other damage to Haidilao brand in the future. However, in this case, the Tianxin District Court of Changsha held that the defendant Hedi Old Restaurant did not constitute the registered trademark of the plaintiff Haidilao Company? Haidilao? Infringement of trademark rights. The Tianxin District People's Court of Changsha rejected the claim of the plaintiff Sichuan Haidilao Catering Co., Ltd. in the first instance.
Haidilao? Thought it was used by the old Hedi restaurant? River bottom fishing? Logo is approved and registered by Haidilao Company? Haidilao? The trademark is similar to the trademark, but the Tianxin District Court in Changsha thinks that? River bottom fishing? Logo and? Haidilao? Although there is a trademark? Bottom fishing? However, there are still some differences between these two words in terms of overall font and pronunciation. River? Word sum? Sea? Although pinyin begins with h, there is no similarity between the two pronunciations. Secondly, the recipes operated by all the shops under Haidilao Company are Sichuan hot pot series, while the recipes operated by Hedilao Restaurant are typical Hunan cuisine series. Therefore, the defendant Haidilao Restaurant does not constitute the registered trademark of the plaintiff Haidilao Company? Haidilao? Infringement of trademark rights. However, after winning the case in Hedilao, Hedilao changed the name of the store used before, and the proprietress said: Haidilao is a catering giant, and we don't want any trouble? After the incident, the signboard was actively removed. River bottom fishing? Changed? Is the river bottom fresh? .