First, judging from the fact that merchants can't help hitting people at home, it is the impulse of merchants. Nowadays, many people order takeout. In order to attract consumers, merchants have introduced preferential policies such as red envelopes and full reduction. A shop owner in Hangzhou also set up a red envelope and set that ordering food is not allowed.
A young man in Hangzhou ordered the same thing when he was ready to order takeout. Because there are some discounts such as red envelopes in the store, the young man only needs to pay one yuan after ordering.
When the shopkeeper saw that he had lost money, he called the young man and asked him to return the bill. As a result, the man didn't receive a call at the meeting, and the merchant directly canceled the order. I said that because he didn't have any hair.
The young man thought he could understand the merchants, so he ordered three kinds of takeout in this store. This time, the man received all kinds of red envelopes and only needed to pay a penny after enjoying the full discount. In this case, the merchant was furious and thought that the man was deliberately making trouble and went straight to the door to prepare to beat the young man.
From this point of view, the store is indeed impulsive. Even if the man is not contacted when the order is cancelled, he can be contacted afterwards. However, it is definitely inappropriate to rush to the young man's house and hit people.
Second, although the boy only paid 1 cent for take-out, it was also a rule stipulated by the merchant, and there was nothing wrong with it. Some people think that this young man is too fond of taking advantage. It is said that the rules of this red envelope and full reduction are set by the merchants themselves, otherwise the young man can't pay successfully, so this is some loopholes in the business activities.
Moreover, the first time the man didn't answer the phone at the meeting, the second time he ordered takeout, he also ordered according to the rules of the store, but he only used 5 yuan as a red envelope, so he only needed to pay 1 dime for 30 yuan.
The original intention of users to order takeout is only to save money. Besides, the young man is an office worker. Seeing such a cheap list, he must feel that the business is doing activities. After all, when the store first opened, sometimes it was basically half price or even a loss. Seen from this angle, the young man has done nothing wrong.
Third, the business was not well thought out, which led to this thing. In fact, it should be regarded as a lesson rather than a beating by consumers. This incident can only show that the store did not consider this situation at all when formulating the rules. To put it bluntly, both the catering industry and other industries should bravely bear their own mistakes instead of pushing them to others.
Moreover, the store is to open for a long time. In this case, anyone who dares to order take-out food at his home should take this as a lesson and either learn the rules or not participate in the activities of the platform in the future.
It can be seen that fundamentally, there is something wrong with the rules set by the store itself, so the young man can spend 1 dime to buy a takeaway worth 30 yuan. In the end, the store also paid the price of fine 300 yuan because of his own impulse.