Advantages:

1. Reduce the assessment error, and the assessment result is relatively effective

Because the subject of assessment is diversified, the assessment result is relatively fair, and it is much easier for employees to accept it. One appraiser doesn't keep his word, but it's impossible for multiple appraisers to keep their word together.

2. It can make employees feel that the enterprise attaches great importance to performance management

Let multiple subjects participate in the assessment, and mobilize the personnel and resources of many departments. Therefore, from the overall performance management driving force, it will help employees to participate in and realize the importance of assessment.

3. It can motivate employees to improve their all-round quality and ability

At present, the elements of assessment may also be diversified, which requires higher comprehensive quality of employees. To achieve good assessment results, all aspects should be strict with themselves. It is conducive to promoting the all-round and rapid growth of employees and improving the overall level of human resources in enterprises.

Disadvantages:

1. The cost is high

Because the whole assessment involves a lot of human resources and other resources, and the cycle is long, time cost and work loss are bound to exist, so the total explicit and implicit costs are relatively high. Many enterprises are reluctant to adopt this assessment mode in order to make the assessment convenient and save trouble.

2. because of the emphasis on comprehensive assessment, the qualitative component is high and the quantitative component is low.

We say that the performance of a department or an employee should be measured according to the specific quantitative performance to a certain extent, and the qualitative assessment is subjective, so we say that there should be more quantitative indicators than qualitative indicators in the assessment to truly reflect the performance level.

3. Due to the difference in the number and nature of posts in departments, there will be some unfairness.

The assessment results of departments that are simple, small and have little contact with the outside world are definitely different from those of large departments and those that deal with the outside world in their daily work. Because of the number and limitations of the assessment subjects, there is a certain deviation in the assessment results, which we should also pay attention to.