Recently, there has been a debate about? Public officials are prohibited from drinking? This provision has caused hot debate among netizens, public officials can not drink during the work period of this provision we have long reached **** knowledge, but, recently, a number of governments have introduced the most stringent? Prohibition of alcohol? That is to say, not only can not drink during work, off-duty can not drink. Then, to me this regulation I would like to say my opinion.

First of all, this regulation must have both advantages and disadvantages. Public officials are not allowed to drink this provision can strengthen the credibility of the government, to the government to establish a good external image. Everyone says? Drinking is a mistake? , which is also true. Many people get drunk at the table, often forget their duties, do a lot of things in a sober state will not do, and regret afterwards are too late. Also, not allowing public officials to drink reduces the risk of them getting a DUI.

The downside is that a lot of public government employees are unhappy with this rule. By definition, the time after work is personal time, and they don't feel that there's a need for such strict rules for private time. There are times when you're having a dinner with your friends and you're drinking together to cheer them up, and it's a real bummer that you can't drink with them just because of your job. Not only that, if this kind of public officials to participate in the red and white wedding need to drink, also have to report to the unit in advance, the unit approved before you can drink. There are also some netizens said, there are a lot of people like to drink a few cups at home, which is an effective way to release pressure, if there is such a rigid requirement after work, is not too inhumane?

Netizens for this matter is also? public opinion is reasonable, the mother-in-law said that the mother-in-law is reasonable? After all, you are responsible for serving the people. After all, you are responsible for serving the people, and the nature of your work is different from that of an ordinary nine-to-five job. Therefore, I think this kind of public officials should choose to accept, rather than reject!