The 19th CPC National Congress report for the first time put forward the strategy of rural revitalization, and to make specific path arrangements and policy choices, rural revitalization strategy put forward by the CPC Central Committee is a long-term concern about the three rural issues made strategic choices, and this strategy is not only confined to the three rural issues to solve the problem of the three rural issues, but also to the three rural issues to the rural revitalization of the strategic height of the policy measures and practices in the past, based on the condensation and ascension of results. It is a condensation and sublimation on the basis of previous policy measures and practical achievements, so that previous policies and measures can synergize with each other and be organically integrated with the strategy of urban-rural integration and regional coordinated development. Therefore, the implementation of rural revitalization is not a new stove, but a strategic choice based on the policy measures of the three rural areas and the experience accumulated in the reform and development of the construction of small towns, the construction of key towns and the construction of small towns with special characteristics, and so on, and so how to implement the strategic decisions of the central government into the concrete practice of rural revitalization. So how to implement the strategic decision of the central to the specific practice of rural revitalization, that is, what measures to take to achieve the goal of rural revitalization put forward by the central.

The first thing to be solved in the revitalization of the countryside is the problem of the farmers' pocketbook, that is, to make the farmers rich. To solve this problem must realize the revitalization of rural industries, because only the revitalization of industries can bring about an increase in farmers' income and enhance the consumption capacity of farmers. From past experience, the rural industrial choice is basically inseparable from the planting and raising plus, since there is a characteristic town only began to get rid of the planting and raising plus mode, explore the leisure, tourism, vacation and other industrial modes, but still did not get out of the countryside endowment of the limitations of the expansion of broader industrial space, the reason is that the countryside lacks the attraction of investment environment for industrial capital, especially the logistical support and service system required by the growth of the industry, combined with the The quality of human resources is low, the supporting facilities are not sound, the logistics cost is high, because the quality of life in rural areas is not high, the level of social security is low, the prospects for career development is bleak, so that the capital and talent lack of mobility to the countryside, so the input and output of investing in the countryside is relatively small, which weakens the impulse of the industrial capital to invest in the countryside. Because of this, in the construction of small towns and characteristic towns, both official and academic are emphasizing the core position of industry, but ignoring the basic requirements and conditions of industrial rooting and even growth, and then always failed to effectively open up the natural endowment of the industrial space to get rid of.

Secondly, the basis and conditions for attracting industrial capital is the infrastructure needed for industrial development. These infrastructures are not limited to water, electricity and gas, but also include logistics and service systems. For example, product transportation, warehousing, raw material procurement convenience. Industrial production requires a large number of workers and managers, so medical services, education and training should follow. At the same time, we also need to improve the human environment. Habitat should be an important basic condition for rural revitalization, the countryside is still in a relatively primitive state in terms of garbage disposal, crop storage, energy use, spatial layout and so on. To change the current situation, we need to carry out scientific planning and rational layout of the countryside. Rural planning area is limited, more than a few square kilometers between the scope, so it is not possible as the city is very clearly divided into a variety of functional boundaries, but in a more limited area to accommodate a more complete range of required functions, which should be based on the natural characteristics of the countryside can be a village of a planning, but also adjacent to several villages to unify the planning.

Again, the breakthrough in rural revitalization or the key issue is to make breakthrough progress in the institutional mechanism. Our countryside economy is still mostly based on agriculture, the development of secondary and tertiary industries is not sufficient, the management of rural enterprises is mostly rough and random. Especially foreign capital on the local customs and folklore do not understand, and modern enterprises and folklore environment of the local business there is a big difference, so it is inevitable to bring the institutional mechanism of the problem. How to prevent the county and township obsolete economic system to the countryside extension, it is necessary to pre-design the rural economic system. The 19th CPC National Congress Report, when proposing the strategy of rural revitalization, pointed out that it is necessary to strengthen the basic work of the rural grassroots, and improve the rural governance system combining self-governance, the rule of law, and the rule of morality. This suggests that the central government at a high level has different considerations for the rural governance system than for the urban system. From a practical point of view, rural revitalization should, first of all, break down the institutional mechanisms that impede the flow of capital and technical talents to the countryside, create a good business environment, and truly give full play to the fundamental role of the market in the allocation of resources, so as to give all kinds of capital more room for manoeuvre. The reform of the government administrative system is not only about reforming the business system and compressing the approval matters, but also about avoiding the government's arbitrary intervention in the production and operation of enterprises, especially the numerous inspections and researches. Township institutions based on the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy of the institutional mechanism for adaptive consolidation of institutions, downsizing, in principle, should be significantly reduced economic management functions, good business services on the line, more energy for social management, social welfare, environmental protection and so on. The villagers' committee, as a villagers' self-governing organization, should, under the leadership of the government, focus on exploring the governance mode in line with socialism with Chinese characteristics, reasonably determine the boundaries of self-governance, and innovate self-governance methods and approaches to make self-governance reasonable and effective. To our understanding, autonomy is villagers' self-governance, and villagers' self-governance organization is the village committee, the rule of law is the national laws and regulations, the main body of action is the government, and the rule of morality is the rural secular society for a long time the formation of customs and folk covenant. China's countryside is originally a secularized society that has existed for thousands of years. In modern society, due to excessive government intervention, the secular structure has been destroyed and the ability of self-governance has been lost and replaced by the government, and the reform and opening up of the village committees characterized by self-governance has become deformed due to the loss of secular foundations, so how to restore the ability of self-governance to secular societies in the countryside is the key to the reform. Tradition should be abandoned, but of course it should not be preserved without improvement. Instead, when the traditional secular structure is preserved, how to inject new modern elements, so as to revitalize and energize it. China's imperial era does not advocate the downward shift of imperial power, nor does it advocate that the imperial power roaming, there is an appropriate boundary between imperial power and secular, in order to reduce the burden on the public to minimize financial expenditure staff, with demonstration rather than administrative to manage the village, these experiences, although it is a product of the pre-modern agrarian society, if they are used critically, it is not difficult to be in line with the modern governmental management. Closer ties between village committees and secular societies will greatly reduce financial expenditure, make government administration more effective, lighten the burden on farmers, and bring into play the spontaneity and self-discipline of secular management by village clans. In fact, in some villages, apart from the village committee, the clan secular forces behind it are still at work, so why not integrate them but pit them against each other. The result of the confrontation is that the decisions of the village committee cannot be customized and enforced, and the clan secular forces cannot function openly, and the synergy that should be there is held back by each other.

The fourth is to improve the production and living environment of rural residents. The strategy of rural revitalization is an important initiative to fully realize the well-being of China's rural areas. The goal of the rural revitalization strategy put forward by the 19th CPC National Congress is to have prosperous industries, ecological livability, civilized countryside, effective governance, and a rich life, so improving the rural living environment is a proper topic. Since the reform and opening up, the Party and the country have continuously increased investment in rural infrastructure construction in order to improve the living environment of rural residents, but many infrastructures are dilapidated and deserted due to the lack of management in the case that the rural governance system is not yet very perfect. It is obviously inappropriate for rural infrastructure to be managed by multiple departments such as water, electricity and gas departments as in the case of urban infrastructure, so consideration can be given to the establishment of infrastructure operation centers in villages to unify the management and operation of various infrastructures. Improvement of the rural habitat focuses on living sewage waste treatment, the development and utilization of new energy sources, especially focusing on the use of new technologies and new equipment, such as sewage recycling facilities for family units, according to different conditions in the countryside through the harmless use of orange stalks, solar energy, natural gas, biogas and other development and utilization of the countryside to improve the structure of the use of energy in order to improve the quality of air in the countryside.

The core of the rural revitalization strategy is industrial revitalization, through industrial revitalization to improve the income of rural residents, with higher incomes rural residents have the ability to consume a variety of services, to pay for the use of various infrastructure costs. The perfect infrastructure and logistic service system is the necessary condition to undertake the industrial capital.