Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Catering franchise - Nanchong network celebrities shoot videos of cooking sharks, causing controversy! What is the focus of the dispute?
Nanchong network celebrities shoot videos of cooking sharks, causing controversy! What is the focus of the dispute?
Recently, an online celebrity in Sichuan has aroused great concern about buying sharks to cook. Sichuan Nanchong Agriculture and Rural Bureau made it clear that this "shark" originated from the coastal city of Fujian, and the person in charge had been manipulated by the police. At the beginning of this incident, Weibo blogger "Fairy Tale Q Explosion" explained that if you see similar situations in the future, you will continue to resolutely report that "fairness and justice are not easy to compromise everything." On July 3 1 day, Nanchong police explained that the great white shark in the video of the online celebrity blogger "Hong Yu" was indeed a man-eating shark. In that case, is this matter suspected of a crime?

According to the first paragraph of Article 341 of China's Criminal Law, the illegal acquisition of precious and endangered wild animals and their products in China's protected areas constitutes a crime of harming precious and endangered wild animals, and it is punishable by fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention and a fine; If the circumstances are bad, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years but not more than ten years, and shall also be fined; If the circumstances are especially serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years and shall also be fined or illegally obtained.

Generally speaking, man-eating sharks (also known as great white sharks) belong to the second-class protected animals in the national list of key protected wild animals. According to Article 4 of the Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in Handling Criminal Cases of Destruction of Wild Animal Resources (hereinafter referred to as the Interpretation), it belongs to the "precious and endangered wild animals in China's protected areas" as stipulated in the first paragraph of Article 341 of the Criminal Law.

The Interpretation further stipulates that "recycling" as stipulated in the first paragraph of Article 341 of the Criminal Procedure Law includes purchase for profit and self-purchase. Therefore, the personal behavior of buying a man-eating shark to drink conforms to the constitutive requirements of the crime of hurting precious and endangered wild animals.

According to the Standard Catalogue of Basic Values of Aquatic Wild Animals, the standard utilization value of snakehead is 20,000 yuan, and according to the Measures for Evaluating the Value of Aquatic Wild Animals and Their Products, the index value of the protection level of aquatic wild animals in the national second-class nature reserve is 5. The overall utilization value of aquatic wild animals to adults is calculated by multiplying the quasi-utilization value of the corresponding species by the protection level index value, so the evaluation value of adult man-eating sharks is calculated.

Therefore, even considering that the man-eating shark is likely to be a young great white shark, the evaluation value of the small animal products involved will definitely exceed 20,000 yuan. According to the explanation, illegal acquisition of rare and endangered wild animals and their products in China's protected areas, with a use value of more than 200,000 yuan, is less than 200,000 yuan, and should be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention and fined for the crime of hurting rare and endangered wild animals.

Therefore, in this case, although the act of feeding itself does not constitute a crime, because the sale has long been suspected of harming precious and endangered wild animals, it meets the standards of criminal prosecution, so there must be a source of small animal products. Whether the customer participates in the punishment depends on whether it is clearly known subjectively.

Many history museums are trying to protect the ecological environment cultivated by the public, without hunting or wildlife propaganda, which is very easy to be covered up and biased by the anchor's illegal behavior. In the future, a large number of anchors and the masses will take hunting, selling and taking away wild animals as the spreading point of trembling and little red books, which will be a disaster! Therefore, network anchors and all kinds of people should also know that our country cherishes and protects wild animals, and don't make mistakes because of missing them.