From the beginning, this film makes you feel as if you are not a vegetarian, and human beings have no feeling of the future. Doctors, scholars, experts, actors, etc. Everyone is telling the audience the benefits of vegetarianism, the significance of vegetarianism, vegetarianism and the future of mankind in warning language. There are several famous actors who are committed to saying that vegetarianism is the future and health, which makes people feel that it has caused it. A guest with glasses also said that "nomads seldom eat meat as before". Later, he saw a middle-aged grandfather, without looking at the specific name, and even added vegetarianism to the perspective of the soul. It sounds like he will be a vegetarian soon. Not eating vegetarian food runs counter to the feeling that social development and human progress are backward.
After watching the whole documentary, I feel that this film seems to be advertising a specific food with a purpose, because there are many reports of "artificial meat" behind it. Looking back at the whole movie, I have been strongly recommending vegetarianism. It is said that there are 65,438+0/65,438+00 people in the United States, 65,438+0/6 people in Britain who have been or are considering becoming vegetarians, and there are many influential people in China. These phenomena about vegetarianism are undeniable, but the publicity of this film is very uncomfortable.
In fact, isn't human being a fusion of omnivores? In addition, it is true that pandas eat bamboo, but sometimes they must be vegetarian. It can be said that most animals in the world are not vegetarians, not to mention nomads in the past. Nomads used to eat little meat, so what do they eat, flowers and plants? This is the good life now. If you are still worried about food and clothing, who else is talking about vegetarianism here?
There is another point in the film, because eating animal food indirectly leads to human demand for natural resources, which leads to a series of ecological crises, disasters and even wars between human beings. First of all, I think there are various decisive factors in the development and change of human beings, and anything may lead to contradictions and disasters, because eating animals is so harmful? Does that mean that if humans didn't eat meat before, it wouldn't lead to the development of so many problems now, and humans could live in peace? Is it because the meat eaten by human beings leads to the animality of human beings? Or will vegetarians live in peace and there will be no crisis caused by human beings on the earth?
If you ask me, vegetarianism is a personal idea. Some people like to eat meat, others like to be vegetarian, and then all of them affect some people. These personal ideas cannot be imposed on everyone. Vegetarianism itself is also the reason. The guests in the film express vegetarianism in a mysterious way, and people are surrounded by clouds. What is the "stalk" of "artificial meat"? This "artificial meat" is not the natural meaning conveyed by vegetarianism.
As an ordinary rural person, I don't understand some truth, but people live to survive, and a healthy body is of course the most basic. But in the face of complicated labor and tense pace of life, it is definitely not possible to eat vegetarian food alone. The example in the film that eating vegetarian food can exercise muscles is something that ordinary people can't learn, and you don't have this condition. Vegetarianism is impossible if you don't build on the quality of life.
So I have reservations about this public service documentary.