The store in the sea urchin incident said it would sue consumers! This matter has been fermented so far, and it is really not for onlookers to find out who is right or wrong. After all, the store seems to be justified, while the consumer Mr. Li is justified. In the case that the two sides hold their own words, it is necessary to discuss whether it is right or wrong to win or lose. It seems that it is really necessary to go to court and present evidence, so that the judge can judge who is right or wrong and who should bear legal responsibility according to law.

Now, Mr. Li, the consumer, has released a video, briefly describing the cause of the incident. After that, he wants the public to give him a chance and give the store a chance. Such a voice is suspected to indicate that he and the store are both wrong and have something wrong. My personal guess is that the sea urchin in the store really has no guts! However, when Mr. Li is handling this matter, there are also statements threatening the store. Therefore, Mr. Li may not have the intention to win the case in court, so he can only take a step back! Restaurant voice

The person in charge of the restaurant involved is confident to ensure that there are no defects in the whole service, food production and processing, and customer problem handling. Will there be a reversal in the final result? . ? Yun Qi? Watching the sea SEESEA? Is a newly-built punch-in restaurant in online celebrity, located in the tourist scenic spot, close to the Dadonghai seaside in Sanya. There is a 95% chance that we will prosecute him. ? The person in charge of the restaurant said that all the information had been provided to the relevant departments, and the relevant person in charge of the Hainan Provincial Market Supervision Administration also visited the store and expressed support for the restaurant's rights protection. ? The other 5% depends on the customer's attitude and apology. ? Netizen Meng circle

This matter has made a lot of noise on the Internet, and it has been on CCTV news. Now the status quo of the matter is that Mr. Li, the consumer, has taken the initiative to make peace, and netizens suddenly feel that supporting Mr. Li supports a loneliness! After all, the parties don't pursue it, and they don't want the truth to come out. The netizens are working hard and there is no conclusion. I have to say that this kind of consumer dispute can be big or small. If it is really just a misunderstanding, it is good to solve it. Don't use public opinion to think about it!

the store in the sea urchin incident said that it would sue consumers! It doesn't matter who is right or wrong now.