From the perspective of human rights, people have the right to sell goods for trading. People also have the right to fair trade and food safety. People also have the right to ask for a clean living environment and convenient transportation. These are all human rights, which can form rules that everyone abides by through negotiation between people, or form a legal system by the government, and finally achieve the ultimate effect that everyone abides by and everyone gets rights.

But in fact, we didn't do very well. There are people, government and confused values here. Fundamentally speaking, the ultimate direction of the interests of all parties is the same, and there is no fierce conflict.

The purpose of selling vegetables by hawkers is not to poison the same kind, nor to disrupt urban order, block traffic and destroy the environment. Then why is there such a realistic effect? The root cause is not hawkers, but the failure to form a perfect market order. In addition to vendors, large enterprises also sell poisoned milk, and chain businesses also poison the people. The problem is not hawkers at all, but the naivety in the development of our own social system.

The government supervises the city to ensure its order. Why is there a realistic effect of low recognition rate of urban management? I'm afraid it's because of the low law enforcement ability of urban management, single law enforcement means, insufficient government investment and poor public opinion guidance.

The root of this matter is a short-term conflict of interest. Everything will be solved slowly.