Since August 21, 2012, Zou Hengfu in its authentication of the Sina microblogging successively published "Peking University dean in the dream of Taoyuan Peking University medical room to eat as long as you see the beautiful waitress is bound to get down to put them raped. Professor and department head of Peking University is no exception. Therefore, the Dream Peach Source business is booming. In addition to Zou Hengfu, Peking University, too many sex offenders" and a series of Peking University deans, directors, professors and Beijing Dream Peach Source Catering Company Limited female waitresses there are improper relations blog posts, causing widespread social concern. September 7, the same year, Peking University to Zou Hengfu microblogging speech infringement of its right to reputation to the Haidian District People's Court to file a lawsuit.
The court found that Zou Hengfu had not fulfilled his duty of care to the microblogging speech, and used the Sina microblogging platform to publish defamatory and insulting remarks against Peking University and its deans, department chairs, and professors, which caused the public to misunderstand Peking University, and resulted in a significant decrease in the university's social evaluation of the matter. The statement does not constitute a citizen's legitimate exercise of the right to criticize and supervise the exemptions, its behavior has constituted an infringement of the right to reputation, according to which should bear the corresponding civil liability, so the verdict that Zou Hengfu to stop infringing on the infringement of the microblogging and the infringing microblogging and in its microblogging public statement of apology, to the Peking University to make amends to apologize to remove the impact, restore reputation. After the judgment was made, Zou Hengfu appealed. The court of second instance rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment.
After the final judgment came into effect, Zou Hengfu failed to fulfill his obligations within the period determined by the judgment. Peking University applied to the Haidian District People's Court on January 8 for compulsory execution. In the execution, the court on January 9, according to the law to Zou Hengfu served "execution notice". Upon receipt of the Notice of Enforcement, Zou Hengfu appointed a lawyer to go to the court on the 16th of the same month, clearly indicating that he would not take the initiative to fulfill the obligations set out in the Judgment. on May 28th, the court issued a Notice of Assistance in Enforcement to the operator of Sina microblogs, Beijing Weimengchuangke Network Technology Co., Ltd. and required the company to assist in deleting the infringing microblogs. on February 23rd, the court issued the main content of the Judgment through the People's Court Newspaper, which is publicly available in the whole country. The main content of the judgment was released, and the cost was borne by Zou Hengfu. So far, the case has been executed according to law.