This punishment has effectively safeguarded the legitimate rights and interests of consumers and national information security, and will surely become an event of great significance in the history of Internet in China. At the same time, Didi's punishment also sounded the alarm for other platform companies. In recent years, China's platform economy has flourished, and new formats and models have emerged. However, with the cruel and disorderly expansion of competition, some drawbacks have gradually emerged, such as the killing of big data on e-commerce platforms and the disclosure of private data of App users ... This not only triggered people's thinking about the impact of platform economy on fair competition and information security, but also brought new challenges to supervision. Without rules, there would be no Fiona Fang. Previously, many departments have successively issued laws and policies on anti-monopoly, anti-unfair competition and data protection. With the gradual improvement of regulatory laws and regulations, the platform economy has also begun to face normalized supervision.

The only warning function is that there is no warning function! To tell the truth, the founder and CEO was fined 654.38+0 million, which I have never seen before! This reminds me of Zhangzidao and Kangmei Pharmaceutical in China, and also reminds me of Enron in the United States. At the beginning, Enron was directly punished for fraud and went bankrupt. Company bosses and executives were fined $765,438+400 million, and finally jailed. Even Andersen, the company in charge of accounting and auditing, went bankrupt directly and withdrew from the auditing industry in 1989. I have to say that the superiority of China's business environment is unmatched by European and American countries, and it can't be surpassed!

Because data is to be collected, it is understandable how to collect non-food data. The key depends on the use, whether it is used to analyze and optimize products within the company, or whether it involves personal privacy or even affects personal life, or whether it is used for trading. The data of multiple companies are sold to each other, so it is even less important to sell them to criminals for fraud or analysis of national conditions. After all, they haven't found their own head. Anyone who hasn't been lucky should still make money. Non-food should be cut. What's more, Didi is fine. After rectification, it was put back on the shelves, joined the online car market, and continued to grab cakes with Cao Cao, Yi Yi, T3 and Gao De.

Up to now, Didi has collected hundreds of millions of user clipboard information, mobile phone screenshot information, personal relatives information and passenger face recognition information through illegal means! This is not the first time that Didi has been rectified because of leaking data and involving national information security issues. As a travel service platform, Didi has repeatedly challenged the national bottom line, and it also reflects that there are still great data security risks and loopholes in the current Internet environment.

China is a "network power", and the Internet carries people's spiritual dependence and expectation for a better life. While enjoying the convenience brought by big data, we have to face the security risks of personal data and information disclosure. At present, under the background of Web2.0, enterprises can easily master personal information and data, and users can only rely on the trust of the platform and the supervision of the state, but they still have no control over personal data, so there will always be security risks of information leakage; It is precisely because of the existing Internet problems that Web3.0 era also pays more attention to the construction of user identity privacy protection direction. Relying on blockchain technology, anti-calculation, asymmetric encryption technology, decentralized data access, etc. Strengthening network security from the bottom construction is also of milestone development significance for personal data management and big data applications.

The Internet is not a dark zone, and the problem of network security can not be underestimated for both the country and the individual. The nature of the Didi incident not only strongly shocked other enterprises to strengthen legal and compliance operations, but also warned the entire Internet industry that it is necessary to further strengthen network stability and security, data security construction and personal information protection, and promote the construction and development of China as a "network power".

Capital without borders, once advocated by many people, has been shattered in this Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Facts have proved that capital should have national boundaries, and ultimately it should be used to serve the country and the people, instead of eating rice and smashing pots under the banner of maximizing profits. From the suspension of the listing of Ant Financial, to the approval of Ma Yun, and then to the punishment of Didi, they are telling the entire Internet industry that it is ok to make money, collect people's information, and cut people's food, but not. Do you really have the ability to collect information about beautiful countries and cut the non-food of capitalism? Collecting all kinds of information and listing in a beautiful country looks bad in itself.

It is conceivable that this practice of maximizing the collection of user information also exists in many other Internet companies to varying degrees. The state imposes heavy penalties on Didi, and Lao Hu hopes to play a warning role for the entire Internet industry. Internet is a new format, and head enterprises in different directions often go to the vague area of law. Some companies focus on their own interests, trying to force them to define the legitimacy and compliance of new fields and dominate their relations with the public. This practice cannot be accepted by the society, and it is inevitable that the state will follow up and supervise them.

However, we have all noticed that the state has imposed heavy penalties on Didi, but it has not been killed with a stick. It has been widely expected that Didi will be put on the shelves in the app store, which shows that the public is forming a cognition that the fundamental purpose of the state to rectify and standardize the operation of Internet companies is to urge them to continue to develop and create new achievements on the basis of laws and regulations. The state opposes monopoly, but it has no intention to restrict Internet companies from expanding their strength and scale. China needs world-class high-tech Internet companies, which will form a part of China's competitiveness, which is understood by the China government and ordinary people. We now need a foundation for developing the industry according to law, and then the self-release of each company. The world is vast and there is diving.

In the era when the platform dominates the market, individuals can only earn hard money. Because although the individual's neck is locked by the platform (such as Taobao/Didi /Tik Tok/ Meituan, etc.), they won't lock you up, so just giving you a chance to breathe will make you exhausted, but only earn a basic profit rate and live. When they see that you are going to die, they will loosen their hands a little and let you catch your breath. Once you live happily, they will immediately hold you tight and give you a hand, so that businesses can't survive and beg for death. For example, when Taobao and Pinduoduo open stores now, they have to fight for the price, which is totally small profits but quick turnover. The platform will always keep the profit of the merchants on the edge line that can only solve the problem of food and clothing for the merchants, and many takeaway riders are trapped in the algorithm.

Meituan/Hungry and other platforms? Although many food and beverage outlets have a steady stream of orders every day through these platforms, merchants have to keep promoting sales, and the profits are getting thinner and thinner after the final settlement. By the same logic, drivers who drive on Didi can only earn some hard money in these two years. Before, there were fewer drivers who drove Didi, but now more and more people drive Didi when they have nothing to do. It is getting easier and easier to call a car, with less subsidies and more and more platforms. The purpose of punishing Didi is not to suppress a certain person or a certain platform, but to make the market more standardized and fair, protect consumers' rights and interests, further expand domestic demand and better promote the high-quality development of China's economy.