from the structural point of view, a post-reading feeling should consist of at least three parts: one is to introduce the title, content and characteristics of the original article; The second is to analyze and evaluate the content and characteristics of the original work according to your own understanding, that is, to talk about the overall impression of the work in general; The third is the feeling and experience after reading. That is, the first part is the explanation, the second part is the evaluation of the work based on evidence, and the third part is the feeling, with the emphasis on the word "feeling".

The first point is "reading". "Reading" is the basis of feeling, and feeling "is born from reading. Only by studying carefully, we can understand the difficulties and doubts and clarify the thinking of the article. Only by combining historical experience, current situation and personal reality can we really have a sense of "feeling". Therefore, to write a feeling after reading, we must first understand the original.

Secondly, we must think carefully. The main body of the feeling after reading is "feeling". To be realistic, we must make our own analysis and evaluation on the basis of reading the original. Analysis and evaluation are the process of brewing, concentration and evolution of a feeling. It is possible to make the "feeling" closely related to the main ideas and viewpoints of the original work, so as to avoid being divorced from the original work and rambling too far away from the center.

Therefore, to write the post-reading feeling, we must think while reading, combine historical experience, the current situation and our own reality, and link people and things in the book to ourselves and those we saw, those who are similar and similar to the book, and those who are opposite and relative to the book. So as to stimulate your own feelings, and make it organized, systematic and theoretical. In short, if you think deeply, you can write deeply and deeply.

Third, you should grasp the key points. After reading a (department) work, you will have many feelings and experiences, but you can't write them all. The feeling after reading is the deepest point of writing, not a book review, and you can't comprehensively introduce and evaluate the work.

After reading a work or an article, we will naturally be moved and have many feelings, but many of them are fragmentary, some of them are vague, and they are lost in a flash. To write the feelings after reading, we should be good at grasping these fragmentary and even vague feelings, thinking over and over again, comparing them repeatedly, finding out two outstanding ones that are targeted at reality, then concentrating on them and sorting them out on the basis of deep thought. Only by grasping the problems with practical significance can we write real, profound and valuable feelings that can be used to solve people's problems in study, thought and practice.

Fourth, we should be true and natural, that is, we should write our own true feelings, how we are moved and how we think, and how we write them. The more concrete and authentic our thoughts are, the more vivid and inspiring our articles will be. After reading, we often use narration and discussion, and if necessary, we can use lyricism. Narration is to put facts in connection with reality. Argumentation is to talk about feelings and make sense. Lyricism is to express the passion after reading. The narrative language should be concise, the argument should be accurate, and the lyricism should be concentrated. The three should be integrated, and empty talk, big talk and slogans should be avoided.

From the form of expression, there are two kinds: one is to explain the truth in connection with reality. Explain the correctness of a truth from the combination of theory and practice, concretize and visualize the theory, so that it is flesh and blood, rational, rational and lively. The other is to clarify the meaning from the perspective of studying the theory. According to one's own research and understanding, clarify a difficult ideological point of view or evaluate the ideological significance of a work. Its function is to help readers deepen their understanding of the original text in theory. After reading this kind of reading,