Employees normally go through the exit procedures, in the legal level with the company there is no labor employment relationship. If the employee sues the company, he or she may be held liable for any irregularities or violations of the law.

I've heard that in the hr circle the news is, for example, some companies evade taxes, and then the financial director or financial accountant left the company, reported the company.

For example, some enterprises in the staff social waiting to meet, did not implement the national standards, applied for labor arbitration, etc.; for example, enterprises in the bidding process some backroom operation, and then was reported by the staff and so on.

These things do exist, most of the situation is the enterprise itself violation or illegal, treatment of such things, we are encouraged to comply with the law is the bottom line; indeed, there are also a small number of employees, that is, the kind of ill-intentioned, the enterprise's slander, but also have.

Then the enterprise can take the initiative to respond and counterclaim for defamation, such as a large factory last year, there is an employee was criminally detained is a good CASE. in short, the enterprise to regulate, only regulate, will not be reported, even if encountered malicious slander, the company's legal affairs will be responded to and counterclaim for defamation, the other side will not be able to eat and take away.

The first story happened in Shenzhen.

A certain small boss opened a breakfast store, and at first business was OK, so he recruited two young girls to help him.

By this year, because of high operating costs and the impact of previous epidemics, the breakfast store lost money for several months.

The owner had to fire the two girls to cut back on expenses in order to protect himself.

I didn't expect the two sisters just left the store, the store owner to sue the labor bureau, the boss was sentenced to compensation plus fines *** more than 100,000 yuan.

Because the boss in these years time, did not sign labor contracts with the sister, and did not give them to buy social security.

This is really a case of one lawsuit at a time, because most of the restaurants do not buy social security for their employees.

The bosses who are sued almost never win their cases.

Because Article 72 of the Labor Law states, "Employers and workers must participate in social insurance and pay social insurance premiums in accordance with the law."

The labor law also stipulates that companies that dismiss workers without signing a labor contract should pay them double their wages as financial compensation.

The owner of the breakfast store was saddened, thinking that he had treated the two men well over the years, and wondering why they would do this to their own detriment.

The second story takes place in a foreign trade company.

Also a young man, he was PUA by his boss and asked 007 to work overtime.

The lad was very upset and after a fight with his boss, he was fired.

The youngster was even more upset, so he compiled the evidence of his overtime work into a document and emailed it directly to his upstream and downstream foreign suppliers and customers, and copied it to the Global Foreign Trade Association.

Because of the overtime way to do out of the product in the entity trade is not accepted by the Western countries, the results lead to foreign upstream and downstream suppliers and customers have appeared to cancel the order, so that the foreign trade company losses.