The whole thing is very reasonable for Xu Song's side to accuse Luo Cong of plagiarism.
The plagiarism is more than just 6 notes? Coincidence? overlap, but the lyrics of the entire song, connected to the chorus of Song Xu's "What's not to like" without any sense of incongruity. One is a song from 2009 and the other is from 2018, so to call it a coincidence in this case is a bit of a violation. And Sea Butterfly itself didn't intend to sue, it was Peacock who asserted themselves, to defend themselves? plagiarism? s rights and interests. Public cries of ? Fire on me? , before the sea butterfly company to submit the evidence to the professional organizations.
1, the sea butterfly company did not intend to sueXu Song is the music director of the sea butterfly company, so many years issued a lot of albums and songs. But he is more spontaneous, encountered plagiarism, rarely to condemn.
For example, "Happy Waiting", the tune is almost the same as Xu Song's song; "Leaving the Sorrows of the People", a large patchwork of various songs, which includes Xu Song's song; "Alone on the West Tower", imitating Xu Song's "superfluous explanation". In addition there are "articulate dream", "I see flowers" and other songs, Xu Song and the sea butterfly company has never issued a statement.
Hai Die company in the eyes of fans, has always been scolded the existence of the main reason is that he does not act. Of course this may also have something to do with Xu Song, who has always disliked boomerangs. But this time was different, Luo Cong's company? Evil people first complain? , Sea Butterfly does not respond I'm afraid I'm sorry Peacock.
2, not just? coincidence?6 notes coincidence, this is the wrong statement. When you listen to the song "Simple Happiness", you'll realize that the score and the chorus of "What's Not To Like", are completely similar.
Moving the notes forward and backward a bit to try to throw off their plagiarism status is not silly to listeners and professional organizations. And as a professional music practitioner, anytime you notice a note is similar to someone else, you should immediately make corrections. Obviously the song "Simple Happiness" didn't, with super high overlap with someone else's chorus part, and still insisted on singing it. The company, the musicians, the songwriters, should all be held accountable for this.
Just because others don't come forward with accusations doesn't mean your plagiarism is legal. Other people's inaction doesn't mean you can come forward and deceive the public at will either.
3, Luo Cong suspected of dumping the companyAfter the whole thing happened, there are a lot of netizens in the media platform private letter Luo Cong, and sunshine chat records. If the chat record is true, that is on behalf of Luo Cong began to dump the company.
In his response, he hoped that others would not bother him, and said that as a signed singer of the company, the company lets sing what he sings. The songwriter is not himself and there's no need to keep hurling insults like that.
Whether it's the company or the singer, this behavior is shameful. Plagiarism is disrespectful to the work and disrespectful to the music.