One. Ten years ago? Feet? They applied for the trademark as early as 20 13? Feet? As a trademark, its service life is 10 year. But on 20 19, it was a trademark that was ruled invalid by the court.
2. The court held that? Feet? The trademark has the meaning of belittling the national football team, and the meaning of playing football next to the hand. This obviously belittles the national football team and has news significance and influence. So it was after he appealed three times that he lost every time. Can't continue to use it? Feet? Such a trademark.
3. The boss agrees that it is a good thing for the country to have such a strong sense of copyright when trying to switch to a new trademark after no results. Switch now? Ren zifang? Such a new trademark, and the retention time is short? Feet? Old trademark, excessive. In fact, the change of trademark did not affect their turnover, and no one asked about their trademark. So basically there is no substantial impact on their entanglement.
The above is my opinion on this issue, which is purely personal and for reference only. If you have different opinions, you can leave a message in the comment area to discuss together.