Personally, I don't think this matter needs to rise to an absolute height, but needs to be treated in two ways: 1. As the most famous amusement park in the world, Disney's unique position is attractive to young people, and whether to go or not is a voluntary principle. 2. Disney's management system has its own management inclination and even protection for its own business or partners. Based on the principle that one's own site is the master of one's own affairs, some rules may not be formed in one or two years, nor will they be formed in China, which can be attributed to facilitating park management for Disney.

However, it is worth noting that one of the parties to this dispute is a junior student. When everyone thinks that they are used to the invisible rule of "store bullying customers", Disney has been sued, which has attracted enough attention. It shows that: First, any enterprise should understand the localization of the rules when it settles in China. On the land of China, it is supposed to follow the rules of China.

Second, China has a consumer-friendly protection law, which has raised the legal level. Any business enterprise, big or small, must comply with the law. Three,? China society is not allowed to bully the small with the big, and this time it proves that the younger generation knows better how to safeguard their rights and interests according to law.

I believe this lesson is enough for Disney to change its mentality, and at the same time let people know the importance of safeguarding rights according to law. As for whether to go to Disney in the future, it is a personal choice. It is not bad to visit Disney, and the paradise operated in China is not bad either. In addition, the Consumer Protection Law clearly stipulates consumers' fair trade rights: "Operators shall not make unfair and unreasonable provisions to consumers.