Question 1: What does the treatment of the Vanke incident mean in terms of what's happening , said in the Popular, "benevolence and righteousness are not applied to the offense and defense of the situation is different". When the "largest shareholder" Baoneng turned over the cards, to the entire management of Vanke kicked out of Vanke, the reversal of the situation began, history has once again shown that stupidity is self-evident; even if, as many people believe that "the market does not believe that 'feelings '", but the market needs "justice" (reasonable) - at least meaning that all stakeholders of the "public **** good "(public good), if a player (player), only focus on creating "good" for themselves, and (objectively) to others to create "bad" (including expectations), it will inevitably be met with "Chu Ge" on all sides, "out to mix always have to return", and, the acceleration of the Internet era and the butterfly effect, so that the "afterlife karma" into the "present life". Moreover, the acceleration of the Internet era and the butterfly effect have turned the "afterlife report" into the "present report" or even the "instant report". Indeed, the law cannot be a shield, because what is legal/compliant may not be just/reasonable, and what is just/reasonable may not be legal/compliant, which is why the revision and interpretation of "laws/regulations" is possible, feasible and necessary, and people with a little knowledge of legal history will understand this point. Then, China's current corporate law system cannot be taken for granted as the absolute coordinate system for locating, analyzing and evaluating the Vanke case. Of course, the understanding reader must know that I am not advocating "not talking about laws/legal regulations", but emphasizing that we cannot collapse the "multi-dimensionality (polyhedron) of practice" into the "one-dimensionality (one face) of laws/legal regulations", and that the "multi-dimensionality (one face) of law/legal regulations" cannot be reduced to "one-dimensionality (one face)". Rather, it is emphasizing that we cannot collapse the "multidimensionality (polyhedron) of practice" into the "one-dimensionality (one face) of law/statute", and that "being one-dimensional with the object" is a necessary quality of cognition/understanding. Since the legal/legal coordinate system does not have legitimacy that does not need to be examined, we need to go back to the original point of conceptual-logical (vertical axis) and Chinese practice

Question 2: Important Events of Vanke Capturing Doumen Vanke's 548 Million Yuan Residential and Commercial Land in Doumen, Zhuhai On December 14, 2010, Vanke bid for the land in Zhuhai Doumen for a total consideration of 548 million yuan at a reserve price of 5.48 billion yuan. On December 14, 2010, Vanke bid for a commercial and residential site in Baijiao, Doumen, Zhuhai at a total consideration of RMB 548 million, equivalent to a floor price of RMB 2,000 per square meter. The land, No. Zhuhai Land Reserve 2010-10, is located on the east side of Baijiao Road in Baijiao Town, Doumen District, near Crocodile Island and Baiteng Lake Resort, and also very close to the intersection of "Xianghai Expressway" and Huxin Road in Zhuhai's planning. The total land area is 137,061 square meters, plot ratio ≤ 2.0, building density ≤ 20%, greening rate ≥ 35%. The starting price of the land is RMB 2,000 per square meter, and it consists of two parcels, of which Parcel 1 is residential and commercial land with an area of 71,539,000 square meters, while Parcel 2 belongs to residential land with an area of 65,521,000 square meters. The land grant period is 70 years for residential and 40 years for commercial. Changan Vanke laid the foundation stone of Changan Vanke Center Complex Project On March 26, 2010, Vanke took a 75,653-square-meter plot of land in Changan, Dongguan, at a price of 1.004 billion yuan, and started the layout of commercial real estate in Dongguan.In the morning of December 14, the foundation stone-laying ceremony was held for this project, which was named Changan Vanke Center, announcing that Dongguan Vanke's first urban mixed-use project had been launched. Chang'an Vanke Center is a Grade A office building with a height of more than 260 meters, ranking third in Dongguan and first in Chang'an, and will become a landmark building in Chang'an. "In March 2012, a posting about Vanke's renovated houses using "paper" as decoration material was circulated in major forums. The posting claimed that Vanke's Fifth House in Shenzhen, which claimed to send 3,000 yuan per square meter for renovation, had been sold to a large number of buyers. "The post said that the Shenzhen Vanke Fifth Park VI appeared a large area of mold, wall paint peeling and other decoration problems, some owners opened the decoration materials: closet, shoe cabinets and so on is actually "paper" to do. The situation is true, Vanke admitted that "there is a problem" "in the rectification" Vanke President Yu Liang accepted the "China Net Affairs" reporter interview admitted: Vanke Fifth Park six there are indeed some quality problems, defects, is currently going from one to another. Problems, defects, currently being door-to-door investigation, rectification. "Where we have not done enough, we will replace them all". Problems with the renovation mainly focus on moldy cabinet backs, stone dusting, and damaged paint. Vanke's 2012 commercial real estate events In 2012, Vanke's sales amounted to 141.2 billion yuan, topping the TOP 50 list of Chinese real estate enterprises in terms of sales amount in 2012.In 2012, Vanke took 30 commercial and commercial and residential land***, involving an amount of about 38.7 billion yuan and a land area of about 4.57 million O. It successfully released the "Vanke 2049" product line and created the "Vanke 2049" product line, which is the most popular in the world. Vanke has successfully released "Vanke 2049" product line and created Vanke's special chain restaurant brand "Fifth Canteen", which has now opened five stores; Foshan, Chengdu, Jiangsu and Qingdao have released their commercial strategies one after another; Vanke's rapid expansion of commercial real estate at the same time, Vanke is also beset with negativity: the marriage change of Wang Shi, Chengdu's suspected low-priced land acquisition, the undocumented construction of Vanke Plaza in Foshan, the construction of Vanke Plaza in Foshan, and the lack of certificates. QFII held Vanke A for four consecutive quarters in 2012, of which, in the fourth quarter of 2012, QFII held 167,946,000 shares of Vanke A, accounting for 1.74% of the outstanding shares, with a market value of 1.7 billion yuan; in the third quarter of 2012, QFII held 79,867,700 shares of Vanke A, with a market value of 1.7 billion yuan; in the third quarter of 2012, QFII held 79,867,700 shares of Vanke A, accounting for 1.74% of the outstanding shares, and the market value of Vanke A, accounting for 1.7 billion yuan. The number of shares held accounted for about 0.83% of the outstanding shares, and the market value of the shares held was about 673 million yuan; in the second quarter of 2012, QFII held 151,047,700 shares of Vanke A, the number of shares accounted for about 1.56% of the outstanding shares, and the market value of the shares held was about 1.346 billion yuan; in the first quarter of 2012, QFII held 83,065,200 shares of Vanke A, the number of shares accounted for about 0.86% of the outstanding shares, and the market value of the shares held was about 1.346 billion yuan. 0.86%, and the market value of shares held was about 688 million yuan. Its company deliberately destroyed national important archaeological relics On March 19, 2013, "Vanke developed a piece of land in Nanjing and successively discovered six large tombs of princes and lords from 1,700 years ago, and although archaeologists tried their best to stop them, the ancient tombs were still savagely destroyed". According to Nanjing's regulations, "projects with key underground burial areas or construction areas of more than 50,000 square meters must be archaeologically sound before construction". In January of that year, the archaeology department conducted a preliminary survey at a 50,000 square meter construction site in Yuhuatai, Nanjing, belonging to Vanke's Standing East Properties Co. Archaeological staff immediately asked the construction company to stop work and demanded that the cause of the destruction be traced. However, Vanke's developer did not stop work immediately and delayed signing an agreement on archaeological work with the archaeological department until March 18. ...... >>

Question 3: What is Vanke and what happened Vanke, the world's largest professional residential developer. Vanke shares were acquired by Baoneng Yao Zhenhua in the secondary market, and Wang Shi and Baoneng are currently fighting for control of Vanke.

Question 4: Vanke Baoneng Huarun The relationship between the three, what happened? Simply put, it is the use of the characteristic political struggle in the economic field. Vanke Wang Shi behind the back of the big man supporters, depending on the CR although the position of the largest shareholder but not involved in the day-to-day work of Vanke, so, secretly hooked up with Baoneng to wildly hold shares of Vanke, the main current want to through the Baoneng to squeeze Wang Shi.

Question 5: What happened to Vanke? Ask the gods to tell it from the beginning to the present Information from wikipedia.

Shareholding battle:

On December 19, 2015, Vanke and Baoneng engaged in an annual business battle in the capital market. Vanke Enterprise Co. is planning a share issue for a major asset reorganization and acquisition of assets, and trading in its H shares has been suspended since 1 p.m. on the 18th. At the same time, all structured products related to the company will also suspend trading at the same time.

Previously, the Baoneng system through four consecutive lifting, in the AH shares at the same time operation, the total **** hold about 22.45% of the shares of Vanke, firmly occupy the throne of the first major shareholder. 18, Vanke A again strong stop, market analysis, the Baoneng system may be in the chip grabbing. Multiple sources claim that Anbang Insurance, which holds 5% of the shares, is also an ally of the Baoneng family. The news has not been confirmed by the Baoneng system and Anbang, but if this is the case, the Baoneng system to control the chips will be only one step away from triggering the 30% tender offer line.

On December 25, 2015, Zhang Xiaojun, spokesman for the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), said that the Commission is very concerned about the situation between Baoneng and Vanke. Acquirers of listed companies and other information disclosure obligations, in the acquisition of listed companies should fulfill the obligation of information disclosure in accordance with the law, the board of directors of listed companies to take decisions on the acquisition should be conducive to the maintenance of the interests of the company and its shareholders, the Securities and Futures Commission is working with the CBRC and CIRC to verify and study this matter, in order to better safeguard the market three public order, in order to better safeguard the interests of all parties involved in the market, in particular the interests of small and medium-sized investors.

Question 6: How to simply understand Wang Shi "out" Vanke event Wang Shi is a conscientious businessman, in recent years more than not selling land at high prices to speculate on real estate, but just because not to cooperate with the top of the housing market bubble i to save the economy bubble i policy, so by the people who want to empty the power to pull down the stage!

Question 7: Why did the SASAC let the Vanke incident go unchecked? The SASAC is an ad hoc organization directly under the State Council at the ministerial level, representing the state to supervise state-owned enterprises and state-owned assets. In the high-profile Vanke equity dispute, one of the parties, the state-owned enterprise China Resources Group, needs to accept the supervision of the SASAC.

On June 27, Xiao Yaqing, director of SASAC, responded exclusively to Tencent Finance about the Vanke equity dispute at the Summer Davos venue: "As long as it is conducive to the development of Shenzhen, and conducive to the development of the enterprise, we, SASAC, will support it."

The SASAC intervened in the Vanke equity battle, there is a suspicion of overstepping the bounds of its authority, but also a suspicion of reaching too far. Moreover, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission is responsible for the value-added of state-owned assets, as long as China Resources in the Vanke equity battle does not violate the law, does not lead to the loss of state-owned assets, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission should do a quiet "behind the scenes boss", do not interfere in the daily operation of the enterprise.

Question 8: Baoneng proposal to remove Wang Shi, what happened in 2016 Vanke, Vanke incident began and ended This you should personally ask him personally, personally think, he himself is an investor should support Yao Zhenhua, Wang Shi is also good, will also be his favorite investment object.

Question nine: Baoneng acquisition of Vanke event details, why Baoneng to buy Vanke how to buy Surely there is money to be made ah, and Baoneng in Shenzhen has a lot of land is cheap to buy in the nine years, he is now the acquisition of the Vanke, it's the land to build the house will be worth a lot of money

Question ten: Vanke event *** How not to say business behavior

Why *** to speak