This time, the essay question is introduced by the material, and then the theme is presented, "choice," "creation," and "future," which sounds old-fashioned, but note that it's three words rather than one sentence. Although the commonness of these three words theoretically limits the basic subject matter of the essay, they themselves are common topic vocabulary in the past few years, which can remind people of many things, and coupled with the guiding role of the social news and the development of the country, there should be not a few candidates who are prepared for these aspects. Besides, if we think further about what is related to these words, we will find that they are wide enough in their outreach.

"Choose, create, future" can be directly linked horizontally to "youth, innovation, tomorrow", and if you want to run farther, you can also link "struggle, angle, ideal ", and can even write back to the ancient popular topics "individual and collective" "immediate and long-term" and so on. Simply put, most of the essay-related materials and content prepared by our candidates are useful. It's like a video blogger who, even with all the gimmicks he uses to ask for likes and attention, always gets the same "next time, surely". So, does that mean this essay is simple, easy to write, no difficulty? Must not. In order to explain this problem, first of all, you need to understand the scoring mechanism of the essay to a certain extent.

There is a core difference between the essay and other high school language questions, and that is the scoring mechanism. It can probably be commonly understood that other questions tend to look for mistakes and reduce points downwards, while essay questions tend to look for strengths and add points upwards. By the usual standards, after reaching an average score of 44, the game is not who makes fewer mistakes, but who has more plus points. You think you're playing Tetris, which is about who has fewer flaws, but it's really Snake, which is about who has more strengths.

Back to the essay question itself this time. While it is easy to write about it, it is not so easy to be completely on topic. For example, although it is possible to find a word to write directly on those words mentioned earlier, that can be categorized directly below the second type of essay. The preparation of the content in accordance with the requirements of the form of expression, and the theme of the three words, and then in-depth analysis of the relationship between the three words, the appropriate distribution of each part of the proportion, while with a sophisticated enough pen and comfortable writing, and preferably a little bit of luck to be appreciated,...... this is considered to be a high-quality completion of this essay. There is a wide scope for scoring and a reasonable means of scoring high, and that is where this essay question excels.

The words heard this, that one said: the whole so troublesome, in the end which is good?

To know

To know this, it is necessary to talk about the ultimate pull of the college entrance examination essay:

That is to say, since the resumption of the college entrance examination, the essay has always had extreme north and south poles.

Is it broad, or is it specialized, it is never difficult!

It's definitely better not to be biased in any direction, but it's not easy to do.

The old material and proposition essays, with their clear purpose and direction,

convenient for everyone to compete at the same level, but the narrow scope restricts the masters from exerting their strength;

The topic essays, with their weak restrictions and frequent masterpieces, have brought about the more serious problem of lodestar.

Successive reforms have been seesawing between the two extremes.

This is the first time that we have seen a reform of the system, which is a new one. Everyone has struggled to come up with a more reasonable solution.

Yoooo! Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

After a duet, I'm sure you can understand to some extent the deeper meaning of what makes this essay so good: strong inclusiveness. The inclusiveness of the topic has already been chewed on in the previous thematic analysis, so I won't chew on it here. Inclusiveness for students of all levels was also just explained earlier. At the same time, as a **** the same test questions in many provinces and cities across the country, it is also a super broad topic inclusive of the great diversity of the various regions. Plus there's enough differentiation to give masters room to show off, so I'm impressed that I'm a small teacher with many years of teaching experience.

Summarizing, this topic: there are rules, but also expanding the square circle; blow up the temple, but also stand up to the plate; both overflowing with color and flow of light, but also shallow close to the quiet. It's like a hale and hearty old boy, looking all over the sub ugly c and d, embracing the white dry old wine.