Xiamen online celebrity restaurant operates in the name of a star, but it backfires. This online celebrity restaurant in Xiamen is operated under the banner of Jay Chou. Whoever thinks that the good times will not last long will be prosecuted by the court. Before the incident, many fans in Jay Chou thought that this restaurant was founded by idols, and they all rushed to eat with the idea of meeting stars. As things went from bad to worse, the restaurant gradually became lyrical.
When the restaurant started to make a profit, Jay Chou took it to court. Jay Chou said that he did not authorize the right of name and portrait to the restaurant, and the restaurant should not operate under the banner of Jay Chou without his authorization. This has violated relevant rights and interests to a certain extent, thus causing mental damage to Jay Chou.
Draw water with a sieve, and the online celebrity shop was sued for not knowing it. On the premise of conclusive evidence, the store paid Jay Chou 220,000 mental damages as compensation. He was also forcibly stopped from continuing to infringe on his portrait rights, re-planned the theme of the restaurant, and reopened after reorganization.
The online celebrity restaurant refused to accept the first-instance judgment. After the judgment of the first instance, the restaurant paid a corresponding price for the infringement. However, the restaurant seems to have been instructed by experts and came out again. Trouble? With the signing of the joining agreement, you can use Jay Chou's portrait and name, which is guaranteed by the agreement, so there is no infringement. However, this is not the case. The restaurant did sign some agreements before and did have the right to use it within the specified time. However, the agreement has passed the prescribed time. However, after the agreement time ended, the restaurant did not revoke all the rights and interests about Jay Chou, but continued to use it, thus infringing on the right to portrait. So the lawsuit against the restaurant ended in failure and a week-long apology statement was issued.
Conclusion Under any circumstances, we should not infringe upon the relevant rights and interests of others for the purpose of making profits. If there is a relevant agreement signed in advance, it should be implemented in black and white, not opportunistic and self-defeating.