A debate draft

Zuo Zhuan has a cloud: frugality is the virtue; Waste is great evil. We are duty-bound to build an economical society.

to make it clear from the beginning that a conservation-oriented society is to make rational use of resources and form a conservation-oriented social fashion. Consumption saving means not restraining people's consumption, but rational and civilized consumption, one is not wasting, and the other is buying economical products and services. Production saving is measured and standardized by economic benefits, that is, the ratio of input to output. In the production process, high-efficiency and low-energy production is carried out. The standard we measure today is to see which has more potential for saving and which solves the problem fundamentally.

After clarifying the concept, we will demonstrate it from the following three aspects:

First, from a theoretical perspective, society is a broad concept. A conservation-oriented society requires us to keep the habit of saving at all times. As we all know, our daily life, food, clothing, housing and transportation are always involved in consumption, and everyone plays the role of a consumer from the moment of birth. But not everyone is engaged in production, and production saving can only guarantee some production workers to save in production. Consumption saving is more directly related to the whole lifestyle, more universal, and can achieve social saving.

second, from the factual level, social activities are divided into four links: production, distribution, exchange and consumption. Consumption determines whether the value generated by the first three links can be fully utilized. We need production saving, but only consumption saving can realize the value of production saving, otherwise all previous efforts will be wasted. Our country is now in the period of social transformation, and there are still obvious unfair phenomena in the distribution and exchange. Only when we reform politics and start with saving consumption, can we educate the people and regions who get rich first to understand the truth that they have the right to consume and have no right to waste, so as to make rational use of resources.

Third, from the perspective of value, saving consumption can better establish a social atmosphere of saving. Production saving can improve the utilization rate of raw materials in production through technology, management and other means, so as to achieve internal saving in production, but production is only a part of society, while consumption runs through the whole production and life. Bernard Shaw said that life saving is an art, which makes people enjoy life to the maximum. The saving of consumption not only saves resources objectively, but also is a long-term and stable spiritual quality and lifestyle, which can promote the formation of saving fashion.

to sum up the above three points, we believe that consumption saving is more important than production saving in a conservation-oriented society.

thank you!

Refutation

Today, we see that many people in society can't produce, so how can they save on production? The starving children can't produce, the inexperienced students haven't produced yet, the laid-off and unemployed workers have temporarily stopped production, and the retired old people have already left production. They are all members of our society, but you have to focus on production saving. Is it true that only those producers who work can talk about saving only during their production? So what you described for us today is an economical factory company, or does it really cover the Puluo people?

The other debater gave us various benefits brought by the change of production mode, which we all admit, but what you can't solve is the problem of how to put an end to waste at the root. You told me that if the energy is not enough, we can switch to another resource. Is it true that there will be no waste if we switch to another resource? How can you make up for the waste of the new resources you changed? Can we understand that the new technology you mentioned is not saving resources at all, but choosing to pass on a new resource to waste? Is this kind of thinking of changing if it is not enough really the conceptual saving we advocate today?

We can see that saving in consumption actually affects everyone's lifestyle, and lifestyle can also affect production. Saving in consumption not only affects everyone in society, but also promotes both production and consumption. Why isn't it the top priority for us to establish an economical society? On the other hand, can we expect a group of people who are extravagant in life to save every bit of our production, and how can we believe that those who are not aware of saving in their consumption habits can actually save production? Is it true that only by starting with consumption, the purification of atmosphere and the cultivation of habits are the fundamental reasons for our society to form savings?

We can see that today's manufacturers can't save their ideas at the social level, whether they are saving in their own interests or responding to the call of the state. The system reform has reduced the number of repetitive buildings, but some people still have several houses alone and can still stay home all night. Technological innovation has eased the peak pressure of electricity, but some people still let the sun rise and never put out the ever-burning lamp; The national policy has repeatedly strengthened the utilization rate of resources, but the luxurious golf courses still crowd out the land that farmers depend on for survival. It is clear that low-income people produce in an economical way and then squander it at will for the high-income class. Is this society of "farmers are like soup in their hearts, and sons and grandsons are shaking their hands" really an economical society that you can build by saving production?

Why can't the repeated rectification of the production mode resist the arrogance and extravagance of decent rich people? And why can't the continuous improvement of production technology restrain the black sheep who have no money from spending money like water? We can't deny that production saving is a necessary condition for a prosperous and harmonious society, but we also see that saving by changing the real consumption concept is the fundamental purpose to be followed by a conservation-oriented society.

cross-examination (1)

1 I would like to ask four questions: does Yuan Longping meet the requirements of a conservation-oriented society by developing hybrid rice, improving the land utilization rate and creating economic benefits of more than 21 billion yuan every year?

2 But in 2114 alone, the food waste in China's catering industry was as high as 61 billion yuan, and the sum of three years' production savings was wasted in one year. How to solve the problem that the consumption waste rate exceeded the production savings rate?

3 However, hybrid rice has been the greatest achievement in production saving since the founding of the People's Republic of China, but why can't it stop this extravagance and waste? Second Debate (Is it true that Yuan Longping is now studying super rice so that people who waste food can have more food to waste with confidence? Debate 2)

4 It can be seen that only by solving the problem in the consumption field can all the efforts of saving in the production field not be wasted.

Cross-examination (2)

1 Excuse me, is it a sign of production saving to build Qinshan Nuclear Power Station in China and change the original thermal power generation into nuclear power generation?

I would like to ask you four more questions. Do you know the highest record of power generation in Qinshan Nuclear Power Station in 2113 or not?

3 is 2.72 billion kwh! I would like to ask you four more questions. How much electricity is wasted every year by high-energy lighting in Beijing?

42.94 billion kwh! I would like to ask Beijing Lighting to waste a Qinshan nuclear power plant in one year. Is it worth it that your hard-earned production and savings are wasted so easily in the end? Debate!

5 In fact, it is not difficult to solve this problem. As long as the consumption content is changed and the high-energy-consuming electric lamps in Beijing are replaced by energy-saving ones, the country's painstaking efforts will not be wasted.

(Yes, the key lies in the production of energy-saving lamps. Only when Beijingers change their consumption concept and buy such energy-saving lamps instead of high-energy-consuming lamps can the country's production savings be wasted, so it is more important to save consumption.)

Free debate

A luxury product

1 How can you change the bad atmosphere of contemporary young people chasing luxury goods and blindly comparing with others?

2 According to Xinhuanet, China, with a per capita GDP of just over $1,111, accounts for 31% of the world luxury market. Can you tell me how to reverse this social trend by saving production?

3 (But can you make diamonds as expensive as glass? Are you going to fake it? But fraud is also a disaster caused by waste of consumption! Production economy can also form a good social atmosphere: the United States is a production-saving society, but it is also the most wasteful country. )

4 He only has 5% of the world's population, but he consumes 25% of the world's energy. Can China people consume like this?

5 The other debater still doesn't understand that production has been saved, but the social atmosphere has not been reversed. How can a conservation-oriented society be like He Jiancheng?

Second, government waste

1 According to People's Daily, the procurement scale of the central government in 2114 exceeded 111 billion, but waste accounted for half. How can you make up for this 51 billion deficit by saving production?

Premier Wen pointed out at the working meeting that China spends 211 billion yuan on public funds every year. How can you save this 211 billion yuan deficit? (So you mean it doesn't matter if you eat or drink at public funds? Anyway, production can be saved! )

3 according to the questionnaire survey of Beijing municipal government, the power consumption of a public servant for 1 days is enough for the daily life of an ordinary people for 19 days. How can you solve this problem?

3 It can be seen that production economy can't solve the problem of government waste, which is an important goal of China's government reform this year.

picture of the third power dormitory: 1. Chen Qingtai, deputy director of the State Council Development Research Center, said: 11% of the power of power supply units is consumed by internal employees. Can your production saving solve this problem?

2. Please look at this picture. This is a photo of a dormitory in a power supply bureau. They use six air conditioners in one room! Now the other debater can always know where all the electricity we have worked so hard to save has been used!

four energy-saving products (consumption concept should be improved: we should focus on the long-term goal of saving resources in society as a whole)

1. May I ask the other debater why energy-saving lamps save 81% more electricity than incandescent lamps, but their sales in China are less than 11% of the latter?

2. But we know that as long as you use the energy-saving lamp for more than two months, the electricity saved is enough to recover the cost. But why is nobody interested in the market?

3. You are wrong. What you want to demonstrate is how to produce, not what to produce. (The total amount of refutation is small: experts estimate that as long as half of incandescent lamps are replaced with energy-saving lamps, one year's power saving is equivalent to the power generation of the entire Three Gorges Power Station.) How can production saving make people rush to buy energy-saving lamps? (in the field of consumption, how to consume and what to consume are unified.)

4. It can be seen that the widespread popularization of energy-saving products must rely on the change of consumption habits.

5. Occupation of cultivated land

1 A lot of cultivated land is wasted in rural areas because of buying land to build graves. How can you save production?

my friend, 21 million mu of arable land is occupied by cemeteries every year in our country. If farmers' consumption concept is not innovated, won't the dead still have to compete with the living for land?

3 opponent, did Yuan Longping invent hybrid rice to make room for people to build graves?

4 It can be seen that the backward consumption concept directly restricts the development of a conservation-oriented society. Can it not be updated?

Saving social consumption is more important. Four debates

Thank you, Chairman:

Hello everyone! Comparative debates should be compared under certain standards:

First, who saves more space? The other classmate said that the total production is large, so there is more room for production savings. However, the income of workers in China's GDP has accounted for 49.6%, and the money that ordinary people can spend on consumption is no less than the production expenditure, right? To say the least, even if the total consumption is really small, the total production is large and the necessary consumption is also large; The total consumption is small, and the necessary amount is also small. Saving space by total amount alone is just like basketball players talking about their development potential by themselves. Is it true that whoever is taller will play well? In 2114, Academician China's Report pointed out that the energy consumption gap between China and developed countries is not mainly in the primary and secondary industries, but in the tertiary industry. As far as the tertiary industry is concerned, the influence of consumption concept is very important. Isn't it clear at a glance who has more room to save?

second, who is more practical and operable? The other students have repeatedly said how powerful the production savings are, but why do they forget the national conditions? The current situation in China is that the speed of energy waste exceeds the speed of production saving, which is manifested by the fact that China's production technology has been improving, but in the past three years, the speed of energy waste in China has not decreased but increased. Production efficiency has improved, but the overall situation is deteriorating, which shows that production saving can't solve the problem. In the face of the waste phenomenon that can be seen everywhere in life, what we have to do may be just to gently twist the tap and turn off the light quietly. Who is more operable?

first, who is more conducive to the formation of social economy? China has the virtue of thrift since ancient times, but this is the virtue of the broad masses of workers, not the virtue of the privileged class. Today, the main body of production saving is enterprises, and the purpose of enterprises is to earn maximum profits. So we can see that on the one hand, business owners are trying their best to save production and control production costs in order to achieve the purpose of reducing investment; On the other hand, it is constantly using various means to stimulate people's bizarre consumption desires, resulting in waste. How can we expect producers to lead us to a conservation-oriented society instead of a conservation-oriented factory when the purpose and behavior of saving are contradictory?

There is a cloud in ancient poetry. Falling red is not a heartless thing. Turning into spring mud protects flowers more. Even plants understand the truth of endless life. However, as eternal consumers of nature, human beings are still struggling in the depravity of arrogance and extravagance. Yes, we hope to see a society that is extremely economical in production and extremely rich in materials, but we also hope that people will really understand the meaning of two words:

cherish! ! !