Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Catering industry - What is the specific situation that Huizhou banquet stopped receiving individual guests after the dog walking incident?
What is the specific situation that Huizhou banquet stopped receiving individual guests after the dog walking incident?

On July 11, Sheng Zhutao, the person in charge of Huizhou Banquet in Bengbu, Anhui Province, responded to the conflict between his wife Zou Moumou and passerby Shao Moumou. Sheng Zhutao said that his wife should not threaten others when she walks her dog. Being detained for seven days is the punishment she should accept.

After the incident, many hotels in Huizhou Banquet were affected, and many customers withdrew from the banquet, and online celebrity got together in front of the store to rub the heat. Sheng Zhutao said that although the brands are the same, but the shareholders are different, the business is affected. ?

on July 11, the reporter visited and found that three Huizhou banquet stores in Bengbu city refused to accept individual guests. A sales manager of Huizhou Banquet explained that the move was for the sake of customers and to prevent people from making trouble.

There is a problem of tax evasion in Huizhou banquet.

In just a few days, Huizhou banquet went from tens of thousands to hundreds, from fame to notoriety, from crowded to closed. All this is not accidental, but the retribution after arrogance.

However, after another wave of unrest, the Huizhou banquet was recently exposed to tax problems. The omnipotent netizen found out that the owner of the Huizhou banquet only paid a tax of 111 yuan this year. According to the boss's income of tens of millions (fake 31 million), he should pay a tax of 13.5 million. This result caused an uproar among netizens.

if 31 million yuan is counted as the company's profit, but this tax payment is also wrong. According to the relevant laws and regulations, the company's income tax ratio is 25%, then according to this calculation, Huizhou banquet needs to pay 7.5 million yuan, but the company actually only paid 32.5148 yuan, which is wrong no matter how it is calculated.