Needless to say, the ass in the market economy.

As soon as the epidemic arrived, the whole social mobility was completely eliminated. Except for those industries with safety nature, all industries in society are stagnant, and the supply and demand ends of the market economy are the hardest hit.

The fixed costs of most real economies are very high.

If nothing else, you should at least have a business place or hire some people, which will cost you in an instant.

1

When the epidemic came, most people were forced to stay at home, and business was basically impossible. There is no income, but expenditure is still necessary. Although the wages of some employees were cut off by the phrase "having wages equals no wages", even in 2020, when the epidemic is so serious, the government can only tactfully ask banks not to count overdue as credit information, and the money will still be paid back.

As for the landlord, under the condition of actually mastering the ownership of the means of production, he depends on the food and clothing of millions of modern straw workers, and it is impossible to be affected.

Under the dual pressure of landlords and money, the operation of the real economy that does not master the means of production will bear a very heavy shackle and will not stop for a moment.

So you find that most businesses that gain a foothold in the epidemic have two characteristics.

Either the store operates for a long time and the business is stable and secure, or the store has its own and the cost is low.

But compared with these, the most important point is the characteristics of the market economy.

Different from the planned economy, the market economy faces individuals, and their needs should be released. However, under the epidemic situation, the market economy gave way to the epidemic prevention, and the overall demand of the public shrank.

In the case of personal action being blocked, the private situation is definitely not optimistic.

Maybe someone here will want to refute me with examples of foreign trade.

Then I want to say that foreign trade is oriented to foreign countries. Poor domestic liquidity does not mean poor foreign liquidity. Of course, in the case that the port may be closed, foreign trade orders are also hidden.

Generally speaking, liquidity is the cornerstone of marketization. In the absence of liquidity, in addition to the most basic consumption such as food, catering, tourism, clothing and other industries related to domestic individual consumers will not be better.

In other words, the epidemic situation, landlords, creditors and * * * have all become the three mountains of the market economy.

2

But the planned economy is not like this.

In the existing economic and industrial institutions, the development of planned economy-related industries has not been greatly affected by the epidemic, and even under the influence of the epidemic, these industries have grown against the trend.

One reason is the license plate.

For the sake of national economic security, some fields must start with Chinese characters, and state-owned enterprises naturally have an advantage in the corresponding industries. Without competition, their income is relatively high.

To give an inappropriate example, just like the cleanup of Shandong refinery some time ago, it is also oil processing. Oil from state-owned gas stations may be sold to 9 yuan, but refineries can still make a profit by selling it to 4 yuan. This is actually the impact of the license plate.

Of course, compared with private capital, state-owned enterprises also undertake higher tax tasks, and it is not unacceptable to have a higher status.

More directly, it is the bank.

In the recovery stage of the epidemic last year, in order to ensure the safety of funds, financial institutions concentrated on cleaning up wealth management products such as Internet wealth management. Taking this opportunity, the performance of traditional banks has risen sharply, and the double-digit profit growth has not been affected by the epidemic, but has provided a huge space for "benefiting the real economy".

2

If you are poor, you will be immune to it, and if you are rich, you will help the world. There's nothing better.

Of course, due to the important role of banks in China's financial system, the entry fee of banks is not low, and other non-bank financial fields are "hard to find a photo". Of course, banks cannot be regarded as the real economy.

All that's left is to isolate hotels or something.

If you need isolation when you come back from abroad, you need to designate an isolation hotel at your own expense. I returned to China last year and was quarantined in Xiamen for 14 days, with the lowest room rate of 550 yuan/day and meals 180 yuan/day. The occupancy rate is relatively high. Compared with the decline of private hotels and homestay industry, the situation of this isolated hotel will be much better.

Of course, isolating hotels is of great importance, so it is understandable that the threshold is higher.

Another reason lies in the difference of service objects.

For the market economy, services are more targeted at individuals, and under the impact of the epidemic, personal business is extremely fragile, so the market-related economy naturally benefits a lot.

But the mode of planned economy is not the case.

According to the news disclosed by foreign media, due to the economic impact of the epidemic, China is expected to launch infrastructure projects as high as 14 trillion, which in itself means significant project demand. Needless to say, it will inevitably involve many infrastructure projects such as water conservancy and railways.

three

The path of the investment-driven model is also clear to everyone.

Compared with state-owned enterprises, the strength of private capital is weak, and the relevant qualifications and environmental protection level are difficult to meet the standards. Theoretically, it is difficult to reach the threshold of bidders for these projects, and naturally they can't enjoy much benefit from these investments.

The dust of an era is a mountain on everyone's head.

At present, there is no problem in China's economic growth under the epidemic. Although the data of private consumption is not bright, from the growth data of foreign trade and fixed investment, China's economy has achieved very bright results.

four

three

Just as foreign economies have stepped out of the "K-shaped recovery".

The epidemic blockade did affect the economic development to a certain extent, but not all economic industries will suffer the same disaster.

When private enterprises come to an end, state-owned enterprises will naturally come up.

The impact of the epidemic on the real economy is only temporary. We should always believe in the strategic strength of China's economy.

After all, the difficulties are only temporary, and there are always opportunities.

Although the epidemic situation is limited, we can't drive our own private cars out to pick up jobs, but at least we still have spare houses to rent.

Hope is always on the road.