Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Catering training - Shenzhen men pay 1.11 yuan when they spend 42 yuan. Does this behavior constitute a crime of fraud?
Shenzhen men pay 1.11 yuan when they spend 42 yuan. Does this behavior constitute a crime of fraud?

A man in Shenzhen spent 42 yuan's money in a restaurant, but only paid 1.11 yuan when he checked out. This behavior is really wrong, but it does not constitute a crime of fraud, because the amount is relatively low. However, the boss can choose to call the police and let the police educate the man so that the man will not do such things without three views in his later life. The proprietress really wanted to call the police, but the boss thought that it was better to do more than one thing, so he gave the man a free bill and asked him to leave quickly. Next time, the man will not be able to eat the overlord's meal, because he is already popular on the Internet, and other bosses will remember him.

When some people are particularly poor, they may ask for money from restaurants and ask them to give themselves a meal. At this time, they may eat white steamed bread or white noodles, and they will not order like this man at all, and then pay only a penny after eating. The man actually ate two meals, 28 yuan at noon and RMB 14 in the afternoon, but he mortgaged his mobile phone with the proprietress in the morning, asked for it back in the afternoon, and ordered some food. The total cost was 42 yuan, but the man didn't pay, saying that he could continue to mortgage his computer and mobile phone, but he didn't give money. This is cheating, because I know that the other person will not sell his computer or mobile phone and wants to eat the king's meal all the time.

Xiao Bian also said in the above that this matter is not enough for fraud, but if men keep doing this, they will encounter a lot of meals that they don't pay in the end, for example, it will constitute fraud and will be administratively detained by the police. However, this kind of thing is not a criminal offence, but an administrative violation, such as picking fights. A man may know that he is doing this and the store can't help himself, so he has been eating the king's meal in this way, and his heart is also very bad.

In the subsequent operation, I think the boss and proprietress will be more careful, and will not let others mortgage things any more, but pay directly, because they have suffered once and been cheated once.