There is no democracy, a hand to become a hegemonic hand arbitrary, dry two years away.
Centralized state-owned enterprises really want to do a good job, the method is as follows:
First, the leadership of the people's election, strictly prohibit outsiders.
Second, the candidate must work in the enterprise for more than ten years.
Third, once selected must work for ten years to move.
Fourth, to strengthen the system of workers' congress, to prevent arbitrary.
V. The disciplinary committee must be filled by excellent workers' representatives elected through the workers' congress.
1, the leaders are parachuted in, unfamiliar with the enterprise;
2, the staff is relatively lazy, strong sense of entitlement, less output;
3, the higher units to engage in capital operation, tossing;
The main consideration of the seat, the vote. The other too busy to care
I am the state-owned enterprises, the ills of state-owned enterprises are understood, just no effort to reform.
The reason why the state-owned enterprises can't do well is as follows:
In this way, it is difficult to develop even the best resources.
Thanks for the recommendation.
These kinds of questions help boost my IQ.
If you were already very rich, would you still be stupid and work hard every day to make money?
If you lie on your back, you will still be silly, every day running around busy?
People are usually short of what they want, so they go after what they want.
If a person has too many resources, what is the motivation for him to work hard? No need to be aggressive is often the root cause of not being aggressive.
If you have great resources, do you still need to work hard? Will you still work hard? You feel your conscience and answer honestly, do not lie to deceive everyone.
Anyway, I won't, don't talk to me. The only reason I work hard is to have better resources so I can live a life where I don't have to work hard.
This is human nature, and only the highly enlightened can transcend it.
Poverty is the cause of affluence, because when you are afraid of being poor, you will try to get rich. Thus, there is this proverb: poverty is not more than three generations.
Similarly, affluence is also the cause of poverty, because the rich used to, do not want to work hard and do not need to work hard. So, there is a saying that "you can't be rich for more than three generations".
This is the way of heaven, can also be said to be the objective law, only a good system design, in order to comply with the objective law.
Born in sorrow, died in peace. The state-owned enterprises have too good resources, there is no worry about survival, but there euthanasia of the problem.
The reason why state-owned enterprises can't get it right is that they lack a set of system design that conforms to the way of heaven and subdues human nature.
Why do state-owned enterprises have good resources but not good? It's the same thing that happened to the people's commune, which made the leadership fat and the grassroots bitter. The company's leadership is still the leader of the bankruptcy! The lazy man slippery head to take advantage of the people more, the real effort responsible for less! Do not implement to people who do not know the pain of burning meat! So in-depth enterprise reform is very necessary.
As a state-owned enterprises old HR, conscience, to answer this question.
First, what is the state-owned enterprises have very good resources? The questioner's intention is to say "monopoly" (this view is one-sided).
In fact, these understandings are one-sided. Resources are divided into two types: those related to strategic security and livelihood, and those related to the social market.
Resources related to security and people's livelihoods are given to state-owned enterprises to operate, which is determined by the national economic system.
Resources related to security and people's livelihoods are entrusted to SOEs, which are determined by the national economic system. When the country needs, people's livelihoods need, these state-owned enterprises to follow the command, at all costs to protect the security and livelihoods, you think about put to the private sector, they will be regardless of the cost of defending the country?
Relating to social and market resources, the vast majority of them are liberalized, and the private sector occupies most of the market. For example, social, entertainment, dining, tourism, e-commerce, and so on. Because these areas do not involve security and livelihood, full competition, fully market-oriented, but the private sector is the most active.
Secondly, what is the majority of state-owned enterprises can not get? The questioner's intent is biased.
According to the statistics, the biggest contributor to GDP and financial profits is still the state-owned enterprises (SOEs).
The average vigor of SOEs is still higher than that of private companies. Some traditional SOEs are going into decline, but for the sake of people's livelihood and employment, the government still keeps them alive, dragging down the overall efficiency. However, many high-quality SOEs are still the pillars of the national economy, and many excellent centralized enterprises are still the eldest son of **** and the country, providing strong support for the motherland to stand in the world.
Of course, there are also some SOEs that are not very competitive and not very profitable. This is not only due to the market, but also due to the ability of the management, and also due to the social responsibility. For example, some areas related to security and livelihood, the state does not allow them to increase prices, the public is not happy that they make money, so many state-owned enterprises do not make money "profiteering", which is a disciplinary requirement. This is a disciplinary measure. Therefore, we must be realistic, objective and fair in looking at the problem.
How to correctly view the advantages and disadvantages of state-owned enterprises?
SOEs have the advantages of SOEs, SOEs also have the disadvantages of SOEs. This is undoubtedly and undeniably the case. The state is also well aware of this, so, reform and opening up forty years, has been deepening the state-owned enterprise reform purpose is not to "weaken" the pillar of the state-owned enterprises, but rather to make up for the shortcomings of the strengths of the reform of those who do not have a good place, so that the state-owned enterprises better and better.
The people of the state-owned enterprises are more "criticized" places are: the degree of marketization is not high, occupy the main social resources, internal management is not advanced enough, the people floating in the work, inefficient, profits are internal staff "eat", and the people of the state-owned enterprises have to pay more money to the government, and the people of the state-owned enterprises have to pay more to the government. We have to believe that the country is vigorously governing the reorganization, the development of state-owned enterprises is getting better and better, the older and stronger, and in the future in the international conflict and the world competition, the state-owned enterprises will certainly play a pivotal role.
2 How to correctly understand the three major responsibilities borne by state-owned enterprises?
Private enterprises, private enterprises, there is essentially only one responsibility, that is, economic responsibility. In addition, for the sake of corporate image, it is also necessary to assume a little social responsibility. However, it is still the main responsibility to "make money".
What is political responsibility? Why is it that political responsibility comes first, rather than economic responsibility? When the country needs, SOEs can serve the national strategy regardless of the cost, at all costs, and what the country needs, SOEs will implement. What the people need, what the state-owned enterprises have to provide. For example, during this epidemic, the country needs state-owned enterprises, especially the central enterprises to resume production, state-owned enterprises are held mobilization, employees become "retrograde". The country needs to produce anti-epidemic materials, state-owned enterprises do not mention the conditions to switch to the production of anti-epidemic materials. The first thing you need to do is to get your hands on some of the most popular products and services in the world, and you'll be able to do it all on your own. The specific examples are too many to list here.
What is social responsibility?
What is social responsibility? For example, China Post, the state requires households to have access to postal services, and even the most remote villages will have access to postal services. The state-owned company's postal workers have to "lose" a lot of money to deliver a letter. Sinopec, even in the snowy plateau, will set up gas stations, in order to add oil to the cars of the Tibetan military and civilians. The state grid, over the mountains, but also to let the village connected to the power lines. And then take the example of the anti-epidemic, the state-owned enterprises produced anti-epidemic materials will not increase the price, the state-owned enterprises to provide public **** services and materials will not increase the price. State-owned enterprises do these "losing money business", not that they do not understand the laws of the market, but in the fulfillment of social responsibility.
What is economic responsibility?
What is economic responsibility? State-owned enterprises (SOEs) are economies, and of course they need to make money, pay profits and taxes, and grow their revenues. If an enterprise doesn't make money, what's the point of having an enterprise? State-owned enterprises have been deepening the reform, modern corporate governance, and gradually create a more market-oriented operating system and business mechanism. Not only to compete with domestic private enterprises, but also to compete with international enterprises, but also to serve the country's "going out" strategy, for example, strong support for the construction of the "One Belt, One Road", not only to make money, but also to fulfill the country's strategic mission, to fulfill the important mission of the country. However, in the face of political and social responsibility, economic responsibility to give way, especially when the country needs, the economic responsibility of state-owned enterprises, resolutely subordinate to the political responsibility.
Three ways to look at the problem of state-owned enterprises not working well?
Before the reform and opening up, the country is the public sector economy as the absolute main body of the era, only state-owned enterprises and collective enterprises, private enterprises and individuals are "cut tail". Therefore, after the reform and opening up, state-owned enterprises faced decades of competition and baptism. At that time, the base was too large, and after the prosperity of the market economy, many state-owned enterprises have been poorly run, which is the inevitable result of history.
SOEs have three major responsibilities, among which is the internal employment problem, and they can't dismiss their employees to the society and increase the burden of social employment. This is a "dilemma", so that the operation of state-owned enterprises is also very difficult. We are all familiar with the internal shortcomings of SOEs, so I will not expand on them here. Because of their own internal problems and external problems of the development of the times, many traditional state-owned enterprises gradually towards the decline, this is the inevitable history. The era of the Internet, some traditional state-owned enterprises are still producing backward products, but you let them transform, how easy it is? They are also burdened with the problem of feeding several generations of people, the transition also requires huge investment, there is also the problem of loss of state-owned assets, and so on. The transformation of state-owned enterprises is ten times more difficult than that of private enterprises.
So, the public only blame some of the disadvantages of state-owned enterprises, but do not sympathize with their difficulties.
Reform, who would say? However, the livelihood, employment, and food issues involving several thousand dollars of state-owned enterprise employees, this problem, really not good.
The public accuses the state-owned enterprises more than objective evaluation. This is some of the so-called "public knowledge" one-sided advocate of the "national retreat," the adverse consequences of the state is being corrected. The state is making great efforts to reform the shortcomings of state-owned enterprises, and I hope that the public will not lose sight of the advantages and contributions of state-owned enterprises. For example, how did the state-owned enterprises fail?
SOEs, especially some centralized enterprises, have been doing well, and have become more and more important in the international arena.
For example, our nuclear industry, is not the fruit of the struggle of state-owned enterprises?
For example, our high-speed rail, is not the glory of the state-owned enterprises for the country?
For example, our great power machine, Zhenhua 30, Xuelong, Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge, and so on, is not the miracle created by the state-owned enterprises people?
For example, our petrochemical, petroleum, banks, heavy industry, power grids and other state-owned central enterprises, among the top 500 in the world.
We can not be presumptuous, can not be one-sided disparagement, we should be objective cognizance of all this. Some people also say, among the world's top 500 state-owned enterprises are monopoly type, in fact, you recognize the opposite is right. If the country does not merge and grow such huge enterprises, how to compete with the "malicious" full of world giants. For example, in a financial blockade, if not for the support of the financial central enterprises, we could have been washed away by the unscrupulous financial predators. And in the "going out" strategy, without such a giant central enterprise charge, it is easy to be bullied by some countries.
So, look at the problem, don't just look at the immediate profitability of this "little thing", and don't just focus on the internal shortcomings of the enterprise, to look at the problem from a higher level, to look at the problem from the world pattern.
A handful of people are parachuted in, insiders, outsiders, not to mention, mainly to play a coordinating role. Second hand, three hand, four hand, etc. are units of the old man, there are a few deputies have a few factions until the following workers. To be effective depends on the coordination ability of a hand.
State-owned enterprises can't do well! It is the ideological education can not keep up! I am a man of the past! Study the writings of Chairman Mao! Armed with Mao Zedong Thought! There is nothing that can not be done! This is my experience!
After the reform and opening up, the first party committee responsible system put into the factory director (manager) system of responsibility, that is, a pen, lost the party's leadership, lost the workers are the master of the idea. Lack of the party's correct leadership, lack of ownership, lack of supervision of state-owned enterprises want to develop genuinely difficult, more difficult is to face the materialistic society, difficult! Difficult! It is too difficult.