Because the underlying logic can be applied to new changes and generate new methodologies when faced with change.

If expressed in a formula, it is this: underlying logic + environmental variables = methodology

Take the restaurant for example.

What is the underlying logic of the restaurant?

is ping efficiency, which is equal to the turnover divided by the store business area, and store rent is one of the most important costs of the restaurant.

So, the store to be profitable, we must find ways to make his ping efficiency per square meter & gt; rent.

Improving ping efficiency is the underlying logic of running a good restaurant.

Understanding the underlying logic, you also understand some of the specific practices of many restaurants.

For example, why does Tai Er pickled fish only seat 4 people?

Because 4 people are usually a family that simply eats a meal and then goes shopping and watches a movie afterwards.

And 6-8 people a piece of dinner, can not be simple, we eat while chatting, chatting while eating, eating tired also stopped to rest a round, and so a table to eat, 2-3 hours past.

And you turn back and you look again, that 4-person table, has already changed 3,4 sets of people, turnover is already this side of 2 times.

So why only 4 people, because this way, the turnover rate increases, which also increases the turnover, and ultimately improve the ping efficiency.

Following this underlying logic to continue to think, what other ways to increase ping efficiency?

The ultimate in increasing turnover is that customers do not come to the hall to eat.

Then increase takeout, increase the proportion of takeout is not also can greatly improve the ping efficiency.

Yes. That's what KFC does.

That's why I say that only the underlying logic is viable.

There is no art, the art can be sought; there is no art, stop at the art.

I wish you to see the bottom of the world through the underlying logic.

Source: Liu Yun