informed criticism is actually a kind of announcement, telling everyone that someone has violated discipline because of something, so that everyone knows that its nature and circumstances of violating discipline are not very serious, and if it is serious, it is a crime.

There are mainly two kinds of informed criticism behaviors carried out by administrative organs:

The internal superior of administrative organs deals with the subordinate who violates discipline, and the internal supervision department of administrative organs or the Commission for Discipline Inspection deals with those who violate discipline. At this time, informed criticism is only an administrative punishment.

The administrative organ shall publicize the illegal facts of the violator within a certain range, so as to cause damage to his reputation and credibility, which is a measure to punish and educate the violator and widely educate others. At this time, informed criticism belongs to the category of administrative punishment.

The relevant laws set informed criticism and warning and other administrative penalties in the chapter of legal liability. Including warning, fine, confiscation of illegal income, confiscation of illegal property, order to stop production and business, temporary suspension or revocation of license, temporary suspension or revocation of business license, and administrative detention.

although there is no informed criticism, "other administrative penalties stipulated by laws and administrative regulations" are defined, that is to say, other laws and administrative regulations can also set informed criticism as an administrative penalty measure in the penalty.

For example, Article 43 of the Audit Law stipulates that if an auditee violates the provisions of this Law by refusing or delaying the provision of information related to audit matters, or if the information provided is untrue or incomplete, or refuses or obstructs the inspection, the audit institution shall order it to make corrections, and may give it a warning in informed criticism. If it refuses to make corrections, it shall be investigated for responsibility according to law.

from the concept of administrative punishment, informed criticism has the basic elements of administrative punishment.

administrative punishment is an administrative act of a specific administrative organ of the state to punish individuals and organizations that violate administrative legal norms according to law. It is administrative, disciplinary and punitive.

informed criticism is made by the administrative subject for specific parties, which is the embodiment of the operation of its administrative authority, and it is administrative. informed criticism is a punishment of the administrative subject for the rights of the administrative counterpart, which damages its reputation by publishing the illegal acts of the administrative counterpart. The most important thing is that informed criticism is a punishment for the illegal parties on the premise that the administrative counterpart violates the administrative order.

informed criticism belongs to the disciplinary punishment in administrative punishment.

disciplinary punishment refers to the administrative punishment that the administrative organ causes certain damage to the reputation, honor, credibility or spiritual interests of the violator as a warning.

informed criticism is just a measure to punish and educate the offenders and warn others by publishing the illegal facts of the offenders.

Extended information:

"The inspectors Wu Moumou, Zhong Moumou and Li Moumou of Wuping County Stainless Steel Testing Center play games, visit Taobao and chat QQ during office hours, and now they are given to informed criticism ..."

Recently, Wuping County, Fujian Province, found 8 staff members of 6 units with problems in their recent unannounced visits to the work style of the organs.

It is understood that some government officials still have problems such as being late for work, leaving early, being inefficient and not implementing their work in place by visiting veteran cadres, holding symposiums and distributing questionnaires.

In this regard, the county set up a reform, specially set up an inspection team for the work style of government organs, and on May 26, the troops were divided into two groups to conduct an unannounced visit to the work style of government organs in 17 townships and counties directly under the county.

This time, we made unannounced visits with uncertain time, uncertain route, and no greeting. We checked the situation of cadres and workers in their posts and the establishment of relevant systems in various units by consulting attendance data and telephone surprise roll call, and checked whether there were problems such as chatting online, stock trading, playing games and shopping during working hours, eating cards, getting in the door, being ugly, and being difficult to handle things.

For townships and units with serious problems such as absenteeism and lack of posts, performance of office County instructed relevant units to improve rules and regulations, and severely dealt with relevant personnel. For units with major problems found during inspection, performance of office County issued the Supervision Proposal, demanding rectification within a time limit.

China discipline inspection and supervision newspaper-Wuping supervision organ style 8 people were informed criticism.