Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Catering training - 6 1 year-old aunt fell to her death by the pool and her family claimed 890,000 yuan. What is the court's decision?
6 1 year-old aunt fell to her death by the pool and her family claimed 890,000 yuan. What is the court's decision?
The case has been decided twice, and the court of first instance ruled that the hotel should bear 30% responsibility and compensate the family of the deceased for more than 300,000 yuan. The hotel refused to accept the judgment of the first instance and appealed; The court of second instance revoked the judgment of first instance and re-determined that the hotel was not responsible. Although the hotel was not responsible, it still made humanitarian compensation to the family of the deceased, with a total compensation amount of 148284 yuan.

Judging from the verdict of the case and the aftermath of the hotel, this is a perfect case. The court was fair and just, and did not sympathize with the weak to judge the hotel responsible because of the grief of the deceased's family. Even if it is found that the hotel has no responsibility, it can still make humanitarian compensation, which shows that this is an enterprise with great love.

Event carding: menstruation forgot to dance pole dancing in the hot spring, and his family claimed 890,000 yuan from the hotel. It happened to an aunt in Yunnan. After retirement, she began a happy retirement. Although he is over 60 years old, he is still young and fashionable. Like young people, he shoots short videos and posts them on online platforms.

Enjoy retirement with my sisters and soak in a cozy hot spring. How is it possible to have such a wonderful time without short video recording? At the suggestion of the sisters, Amy's aunt danced with a steel pipe next to the dance floor.

Seeing aunt's soft posture and graceful movements, the sisters praised her. Amid the cheers and screams of the sisters, the aunt's performance is getting harder and harder, and the danger is greatly increased.

Aunt ignored the danger of the swimming pool and forgot that she was no longer young. Aunt failed to control her balance and let herself fall by the pool. At that time, she fainted. Although the sisters called an ambulance in time and the hotel handled the emergency, they still failed to save the aunt's life.

After the aunt unfortunately left, the family took the hotel to court. It means that the hotel did not fulfill its security obligations, and the prompt sign was not eye-catching. It was responsible for the death of its family and compensated more than 890,000 yuan.

After two trials and judgments, the court was impartial, fair and just in the face of family litigation. The hotel was very angry and said that it should not take responsibility. During the operation of the hot spring hotel, not only obvious tips were posted, but also the edge of the bath was treated with anti-skid. Aunt fell down entirely because of her carelessness and dangerous behavior. In the end, the hotel had to pay for her behavior.

By understanding the incident, the court found that the hotel did not take effective anti-skid measures, made a first-instance judgment, and found that the hotel was responsible for 30%, and the compensation expenses were added together, totaling 300,000 yuan.

This judgment was unacceptable to the hotel, so it appealed. The court of second instance sorted out the incident again and found that the hotel had fulfilled its obligation of reminding and protecting in the process of operation and management; After the aunt fell, the hotel also sent the doctor for treatment in time. Based on the above two points, the court of second instance decided to revoke the judgment of the court of first instance and re-identify the hotel as having no responsibility.

The difference between the two judgments shows that the superior court is more inclined to jurisprudence than human feelings when handling cases. In Qian Qian's personal view, this judgment is fair and reasonable.

The hotel's handling is admirable. Although the hotel has no responsibility, it has already made humanitarian compensation to the aunt's family. As a large hot spring hotel, although they are strong and not short of 300 thousand compensation, I think they are arguing whether they are responsible.

In the whole thing, my aunt, as an adult, knew that her behavior was dangerous, which was another joke about her life. The hotel not only has safety measures, but also has fulfilled its obligation of reminding, so it should not take responsibility.

After the court ruled that the hotel was not responsible, they were still willing to pay humanitarian compensation to the families of the victims. It can be seen from here that the enterprise behind the hotel is a caring enterprise.

Liability compensation is an obligation, and humanitarian compensation is love. They are completely different. Such an aunt not only harms herself, but also brings trouble to her family and the hotel. In life, we should take a warning and learn from experience and lessons.