In this way, they can compensate for their hard work in providing non-standardized services, so as to drive them to play a more dedicated role in related positions.
In other words, after the customer accepts a service, there is really no definite answer to "what should be the reasonable charge"; How much should diners pay after a meal? It can only be determined through consultation according to the wishes of both parties.
As a result, the charges of many catering industries, which are often judged as "unreasonable", suddenly seem to be much more reasonable, or at least, the "reasonable and unreasonable" charges have been put in a big question mark.
Much like this, our major e-commerce platforms are actually exploring the mechanism of market grading. On the one hand, it can prevent our customers from going to shops that are inconsistent with their identity and affect the pleasant consumption experience; On the other hand, it can avoid the huge turbulent losses suffered by many of our "primary markets" in the face of customers with completely unequal strength. This loss is manifested in the violent impact on prices and the ultimate inability to allocate resources to more rational consumers.
But in this case, all walks of life and many of our consumers take it for granted and think it is unreasonable. There is even a professor at Shanghai University who is bored enough to design a more advanced market classification system for such mechanisms and make a time-consuming and labor-intensive "investigation". Ironically, before this "academic investigation" began, our major platforms had designed a set of systems based on advanced theories and entered the trial operation stage.
Macroscopically, based on the consideration of controlling the community ecology, it is really necessary to avoid people of different levels from meeting each other, let alone let them establish individual trading activities with each other. We must start with information and try to do this.