Xiao Gao and her boyfriend live in Shuiyin Kangting Community, Hangzhou. On October 25th, their balcony caught fire, and four security guards helped put it out. Because of inhaling toxic gas during the fire fighting, the medical expenses were nearly 11,111 yuan. This cost is proposed by the tenant and the intermediary.

In the rented room, the balcony caught fire

This house on the 2nd floor of Building 12 of Watermark Kangting has three rooms, which were rented to three households by the intermediary. Xiao Gao and her boyfriend live in the room with balcony. On the morning of October 25th, Xiao Gao's roommate Xiao Zhou was the only one at home.

Xiao Zhou, tenant of 12nd floor, Building 12, Watermark Kangting: "I didn't react when I knocked on the door for the first time, and then I knocked on the door for the second time. When I opened it, it should be 11: 48. They directly said that our balcony was on fire, but I was still puzzled at that time, because the doors on their side (Xiao Gao) were all locked, and I didn't see it at all, and then someone rushed in directly, as if it were a security guard.

Xiao Zhou said that at that time, four security guards of the property put out the fire with fire extinguishers in the corridor, and it took about ten minutes to put out the fire on the balcony. Xiao Gao's work place is nearby. I heard that my home was on fire and I rushed back after 11 o'clock.

Xiao Gao, the tenant on the 2nd floor of Building 12 of Watermark Kangting, said: "We mainly put a big shoe rack. If there are shoes, there are about 31 to 41 pairs. Then there is a coffee table, a small cabinet, a folding chair and an electric fan. Then there is nothing else. Moreover, if we have this circuit, only there is a socket in our room, and the balcony is not."

Xiao Gao said that all the things put on the balcony at that time were burned, some of the fence glass on the balcony was burned, and a glass door connecting the bedroom was also burned with a big hole, but fortunately, the fire did not spread to the room.

The cause of the fire can't be identified ...

Xiao Gao, the tenant of 12/F, Shuiyin Kangting Building 12, said, "(Has the cause of the fire been identified at present? If the cause of the fire, because at that time, the property let me clean it up, and then when the fire came to identify it, it was said that the reason could not be identified. "

Manager Zhou of Hangzhou Watermark Kangting Greentown Property: "This is definitely not what we ordered. If they think we ordered it, then I think their parties should also have some legal knowledge. For example, it is not easy to enter or clean up this fire scene."

the property was cut off from water and electricity because of medical expenses?

Xiao Gao said that on October 25th, the property cut off water and electricity to their homes, and they never helped to recover. Some of them stayed outside in hotels, while others stayed at friends' homes, and they have lived for eight or nine days.

Xiao Gao, the tenant of 12nd floor, Building 12, Shuiyin Kangting: "It dragged us for several days, and then we called the Power Bureau and asked them to come and help us power on first and move in (do you think the property has the right to cut off the power for you? ) This is definitely no right, and they have said it themselves. "

Xiao Zhou, the tenant of 12nd floor, Building 12, Shuiyin Kangting: "We thought that they were going to investigate the fire source and cut off the electricity, but we didn't speak up. Then on October 28th, when we went to the police station to negotiate, they said, to put it bluntly, I heard an important point, that is, the reason for the medical expenses, and cut off the electricity for us. So if you end up sharing the medical expenses, we will have to cut off the electricity at first, resulting in our failure.

Manager Zhou of Hangzhou Watermark Kangting Management Office of Greentown Property: "This is entirely to cooperate with the investigation on the cause of indoor fire. It is very clear about water and electricity cut-off. I will send it to them later."

Four security guards inhaled toxic gas, and their medical expenses cost 9611 yuan.

Manager Zhou of Greentown Property said that on October 25th, during the fire fighting, four security guards were admitted to the hospital because of inhaling toxic gas, and three of them were discharged on the same day. Their security guards suffered from "smoke poisoning" and were hospitalized for three days before they recovered. The medical expenses of four people, total * * * spent about 9611.

Manager Zhou of Hangzhou Watermark Kangting Management Office of Greentown Property: "We hope that the medical expenses will be borne by their direct beneficiaries and their tenants, and then other expenses will be compensated appropriately."

Xiao Gao, the tenant of 12nd floor, Building 12, Shuiyin Kangting: "He helped me put out this fire in time and helped me to minimize the loss. I am definitely the beneficiary, but we can't find out the cause of the fire. We are also the injured party, our own losses and the loss of this room, and we will also be responsible then."

Xiao Gao and his roommate both said that the security guard's help in fighting the fire was a courageous act and definitely worth encouraging. They would express their gratitude in their own form, but Greentown Property said that they were the biggest beneficiaries and asked them to bear all the medical expenses together with the intermediary, which they found incomprehensible.

Tenant: It's unreasonable to put the blame on them.

Xiao Gao, a tenant at 12/F, Building 12, Watermark Kangting: "Because this fire started in our room, we will certainly bear part of the responsibility, but if we put all the responsibility on us as they say, we think it's unreasonable."

Xiao Wang, the tenant at the 12nd floor, Building 12, Watermark Kangting: "I don't think it's necessary for me to bear this responsibility. If I do, it means that we belong to a family, because there is a fire on our side. As a kind of sympathy, we are obliged to help them, but we didn't say that we must put this responsibility on us, because we are also victims."

Haoshi Winbond: We will actively cooperate with

Xiao Shao, the agent of Haoshi Winbond Watermark Kangting Store: "First of all, we have a positive attitude of cooperation, and we will definitely bear what we should bear."

the security guard didn't pay social security?

Xiao Zhou, the tenant of 12nd floor, Building 12, Watermark Kangting: "Aren't they employees who have paid social security? Then he said that their social security is reimbursed by themselves, and the company also reimbursed them a part of it. Then the rest will be shared by our side, but after we looked at the list over there yesterday, it was all at our own expense."

Xiao Gao, the tenant of 12nd floor, Building 12, Shuiyin Kangting: "We also asked other security guards to find out the situation privately and said that they didn't pay social security."

Manager Zhou of Hangzhou Watermark Kangting Greentown Property: "Our security company is a Greentown security guard. We signed a contract with them. It is very clear in the contract that all security guards have to pay social security (the contract is very clear, but the question is whether they have paid it? This is a problem for outsourcing companies. Even without medical insurance, there is public liability insurance. "

Property: If negotiation fails, it can be solved through legal channels

Manager Zhou of Greentown Property said that the current medical expenses of 9,611 yuan are not the final figure, and it can be negotiated again. If negotiation fails, it can be solved through legal channels.

Manager Zhou of Hangzhou Watermark Kangting Greentown Property: "They suffered from the loss of their property, but our employees went to put out the fire. They are the direct beneficiaries of this fire, so we just talked to him about this matter. I also made it clear to him that it doesn't matter if they don't pay compensation. We will sue them through legal channels."

all the fire-fighting appliances were available, but time was short?

Another point that Manager Zhou would like to mention is that they have a special mini fire station in Kangting Community, and all the fire-fighting appliances are very complete. On October 25th, all the four security guards who participated in the fire fighting did not wear gas masks, because time was short.

Manager Zhou of Hangzhou Watermark Kangting Greentown Property: "When this security guard found the fire, it happened to be downstairs, and at that time, there was already smoke, so the security guard didn't delay the fire fighting at the first time. So, he rushed to the fire site at the first time and put it out, and we also found it in this fire site. Even when we entered the fire site, the glass door outside had been melted, and the fabric inside, that is, curtains, had already been burned.

Lawyer: The medical expenses should be borne by the beneficiary or the responsible person

Regarding the compensation for security medical expenses, the reporter also consulted Chen Songtao, director of Zhejiang Fengguo Law Firm. Lawyer Chen said that the fire fighting by security is legally an emergency, and the medical expenses caused by physical injury should be borne by the beneficiary or the responsible person.

Chen Songtao, director of Zhejiang Fengguo Law Firm, said: "That is to say, the person responsible for the fire can't be determined for the time being. In this case, based on the principle of fairness and reasonableness, three tenants should be the beneficiaries, because if the security guards don't put out the fire, the fire may spread and their losses will be great. Therefore, in this case, some medical expenses of the security guards will be borne by these three tenants, and the intermediary is legally.

As for whether the medical expenses are paid by oneself or reimbursed by medical insurance, Mr. Chen said that this only happened between the security guard and the property management company, and it has nothing to do with the three tenants. The tenants can negotiate to confirm the compensation ratio.

Chen Songtao, director of Zhejiang Fengguo Law Firm, said: "The security guard's behavior is a courageous act. Legally, we all regard it as a work-related injury. That is to say, if these security guards, the medical expenses of his injuries, and the three people are all lost, then the property management company should bear the expenses, which means that the security guards don't have to worry about the medical expenses themselves."