The Journey to the West is a familiar classical literature, today I want to talk about insights from the perspective of performance appraisal.

In order to analyze the following convenience, let's put the Tang Monk, Sun Wukong, Piggyback, Sha Monk as a company in the West, in this company, the Tang Monk to decide the main strategic objectives, can be regarded as the chairman of the company; and Sun Wukong is the main strategy of the implementer, is the company's CEO; Piggyback is the company's middle management, Sha Monk is the company's general staff. .

Let's take a look at how this company conducts its appraisals.

In this company, first of all, the appraisal for the CEO is very necessary, because the good or bad of his work directly affects the development of the whole company. Since the Tang Monk can not recognize the monsters by himself, he often treats the monsters in human form as good people, which means that the Tang Monk can not control the process of the Monkey King's fight against the monsters. At first, the Tang Monk paid too much attention to the process and ignored the result in the appraisal, and mixed too much personal value judgment, so that the result of the appraisal could not be convincing. In the feedback of the assessment results, the Tang Monk is bent on punishment as the main reading of the spell, and the resignation of the Monkey King is also normal. Here involves a process of appraisal and results of the assessment, what is oriented?

For the senior, everyone has a different way of dealing with the problem, and his work has a great deal of uncertainty, if the assessment from the process, will inevitably bring great obstacles to the work of the Monkey King. The purpose of the Tang Monk's company is to obtain the true scriptures in the west, the Tang Monk's task is to clarify the route to obtain the scriptures and formulate a general strategy, how to reach the strategy is the Sun Wukong's business. Focusing on the assessment of the process will only lead to the existence of some unnecessary trouble, such as the later bottomless pit incident, due to the Tang Monk insisted that the woman changed by the Mouse Spirit is a good person, thus denying the judgment of the Sun Wukong, and as a result, he was taken captive by the Mouse Spirit, which almost destroyed the whole plan of fetching scriptures. Since you hired Sun Wukong over, you should believe in his ability, and your assessment is just for the results.

If you are not fully assured of the Monkey King, you should do is to establish a perfect incentive system, unify the Monkey King and the company's goals, that is, the Tang Priest should be on the vision of the scriptures and the Monkey King fully communicate with the Monkey King, so that the Monkey King's good or bad operation of the company and their own interests have a great correlation, which is why the Monkey King to the later to get the scriptures when the Monkey King worked harder. As for the control aspect, the Tang Monk already has the Tightrope Curse is already enough. This kind of control is rarely applied in practice, but it gives the Monkey King a certain psychological expectation that his misbehavior may incur punishment, in which case the entire senior appraisal mechanism of the company of fetching scriptures from the Western Paradise is more complete.

And for Piggy's assessment, the process is a little more important. His work is mainly some of the daily work, the results of his work is more difficult to quantify, then the process of control supervision is very necessary. The Tang Monk does not have the ability to supervise, so the assessment of Piggy's appraisal by the Sun Wukong to implement, the Sun Wukong through some irregular spot checks to regulate the daily behavior of Piggy's. The key to the assessment of Piggy's is also to ensure that he has the ability to monitor his work. The key to the assessment of Piggy's appraisal is also to clarify his position, his evaluation should be aimed at his account of the completion of the work, but the company's position on the fuzzy Piggy's position, there is no certain position description, so Piggy has done everything, so in his evaluation, it is easy to ignore its work performance, and some of his personal qualities are entangled. By merit, Piggyback is greater than Sand Monk, but in the end Sand Monk's performance award is greater than Piggyback's.

It is only because the personal qualities of the monk are a bit better. But this kind of personal quality of good and bad and work performance, and there is no necessary connection, and personal quality is a more abstract thing, through the assessment to identify the quality of good and bad undoubtedly has considerable difficulty, and this quality has a great deception, the role of the assessment is to improve the company's overall performance, which is the fundamental purpose, of course, this is not to say that the quality of the unimportant. Individual morality and his environment has a great relationship, that is to say, the corporate culture of the employee's personal behavioral norms play a guiding role, and this can not be achieved through the assessment. We must define the line of decomposition of the assessment and other functions in the assessment, to apply an old saying: the assessment is not everything, no assessment is nothing