More often than not, when people go out to get together, in the choice of restaurants, you will find the store written "do not bring your own alcohol", this sign makes many people feel annoyed, directly and the staff to tear, because they deliberately from the outside of the liquor; but there are also from the outside of the liquor to buy a change of store can bring their own alcohol, or to buy a good liquor back. The wine was returned. In fact, the reason for opening a restaurant is that customers are expected to consume the liquor in the restaurant, and bringing in your own liquor means losing the revenue from the high gross profit liquor compared to the low gross profit dishes. Consumer law allows consumers to drink on their own liquor, operators drink the northwest wind?

What's more, the operator has informed the obligation in advance, which should be waiting for a response to the offer behavior, and did not violate the Contract Law on the mandatory provisions of the form terms. As for some of the facilities of the restaurant is more simple to allow customers to bring their own alcohol, the operator is also out of the profitability of the perspective of thin margins, a different story.

Drinking outside in the rain is different from drinking in a restaurant, right? Is drinking in a nightclub the same as drinking outside? If drinks can be brought in, can meals be brought in? If you bring drinks and meals into a restaurant and get diarrhea, who is responsible?

Additionally, drinking in a hotel to enjoy the hotel's environment and atmosphere and service, the cost of the environment to be added to the use of fees and service charges, and the cost of all this in the dishes and drinks. The fact that the hotel allows you to bring your own alcohol is a discount promotion for the environment and service, but the cost is added to the dish. Taking a step back, should the restaurant be responsible for any problems with the alcohol brought in from outside?

The opposite point of view is that alcohol is evaluated as a catalyst for emotion, so why do some people go out and drink at parties and are willing to "bring their own alcohol" instead of drinking at restaurants? The reasons are realistic! First of all, the price of wine in the hotel is very expensive, many restaurants are not the main source of profit in the dish profit, but in the drink.

Secondly, the restaurant wine is difficult to distinguish between the real and the fake, the quality of the different levels, through which dealers, import channels are not transparent enough, diners eat the unknown. In addition, many people believe that the reason for the increase in the behavior of bringing their own alcohol in restaurants is that the relevant state departments of the catering establishments "prohibited to bring their own alcohol," the banning of the overbearing provisions of the explicitly prohibited.

Finally, in general, people who really like to drink have their own fixed favorite brands, and if they are not used to drinking other wines, they will bring their own from home.

From a personal point of view, I don't think it's a bully, on the contrary, it should be rejected. Look, this is a discussion of "bullying". Restaurants need to expressly decline rather than hide the decline, the restaurant refused to bring their own alcohol, consumers can not enter the store consumption. After the store expressly have to bring alcohol into the consumption, is the bully!