Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Catering training - The Influence of Monopolizing Competitive Market on Economy
The Influence of Monopolizing Competitive Market on Economy
First of all, the biggest drawback of monopoly is that the interests of consumer groups are damaged. Without competition, lack of pressure and enterprising spirit will directly affect the consumption level of consumers. At present, the monopoly industries protected by the government are mainly composed of state-owned enterprises. As the property of the whole people, state-owned enterprises should put the general consumer welfare in the first place, but in fact it is not always the case. According to the data, PetroChina's gasoline of five yuan per liter is even higher than the resource tax and fuel tax in the United States.

Most of the products and services provided by monopoly enterprises are closely related to the daily life of residents, and the price level is directly related to the consumption expenditure of residents' daily life. Behind the high profits of oil, power grid, communication and other industries, it is realized through the price mechanism. Due to the monopoly of enterprises, no other enterprises compete with them, so their pricing has no worries about the reduction of market share, so the prices of related industries have been rising in recent years. Monopoly forces consumers to lack the right to choose, and in order to obtain products and services, they have to passively accept the high prices provided by monopoly enterprises. It leads to the increase of consumers' daily living expenses, which in turn affects other parts of consumption, especially increases the living burden of low-income consumer groups. In the end, it will reduce the average consumption tendency and affect the national economic level. ?

In addition, monopoly has become one of the important reasons for income inequality and widening income gap in China. On the one hand, the prices provided by monopoly enterprises increase consumers' expenses, on the other hand, the high income of monopoly industries increases the income gap of groups. The wage level of monopoly industries is much higher than the social average. According to the statistics of Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, at present, the average salary of employees in electric power, telecommunications, finance, insurance, tobacco and other industries is 2 ~ 3 times that of employees in other industries. If you add housing, extra-wage income and employees,

The difference of welfare treatment, the actual income gap may be between 5 ~ 10 times, and the phenomenon of disproportionate income and contribution destroys the law of talent value. Moreover, some employees of monopoly enterprises enjoy unreasonable welfare systems, such as free electricity for employees of power enterprises, free subway rides for employees of subways, free phone calls for employees of telecom companies, and no need to register for hospital employees to see a doctor. The profits obtained by state-owned monopoly enterprises should be owned by the state and distributed reasonably by the government throughout the country, including for medical and health care, education, cultural undertakings and helping the disadvantaged groups. The excessive wages of employees in these state-owned monopoly enterprises actually occupy the due share of the whole people, which objectively constitutes an unreasonable deprivation of the interests of the whole people. The high salary of monopoly enterprises widens the social income gap, affects social equity, harms the interests of the whole people and causes widespread dissatisfaction among the masses. ?

Secondly, monopoly enterprises have a great influence on the development of private enterprises. Private enterprises account for a large proportion of enterprises in China, providing 70% jobs in society and making great contributions to China's economic development and stability. However, first of all, the status and policies of private enterprises are far less than those of monopoly enterprises. Not only does it have no chance to enter the industry and compete freely with monopoly enterprises, but it can't compare with monopoly enterprises in loan financing, taxation, subsidies and national policy support, thus limiting the development of private enterprises.

According to the data, the net profits of China Mobile and China Petroleum, the two largest central state-owned enterprises, exceeded the combined profits of the top 500 private enterprises in China. Moreover, state-owned monopoly enterprises have high wages because of their high income. High income and relatively little effort are more likely to attract outstanding talents, which makes private enterprises lack advantages in the competition for outstanding talents. Third, the income of employees in monopoly enterprises is generally high, which easily leads to psychological imbalance of employees in private enterprises and affects their work enthusiasm. In order to improve the efficiency of enterprises, private enterprises are not allowed to raise salaries appropriately to increase production costs. On the other hand, the monopoly enterprises of resources and services control the basic factors of production, and their price fluctuations directly affect the operating costs, profits and income of private enterprises, thus affecting their further development. ? In a word, the nature of monopoly enterprises restricts the development of private enterprises to a certain extent, and even makes them get into trouble and suffer greatly. Private enterprises are an important part of national economic development, which has an important impact on people's employment and national consumption level. Therefore, in order to develop the national economy, we should improve the socialist market economic system and make up for the defects caused by market monopoly. The state should create a more fair and reasonable good market environment and improve social production efficiency. ?

Third, monopoly is easy to breed corruption. Because of the resource advantage and position advantage brought by monopoly, monopoly often exposes corruption. Corruption in monopoly state-owned enterprises is on the rise, such as PetroChina, Sinopec, China Civil Aviation, China Mobile and so on. These cases have raised doubts and concerns about monopoly enterprises and the national regulatory system. Jiang Jiemin, former chairman of PetroChina, Chen Tonghai, former general manager of PetroChina, Li Peiying, former chairman of Capital Airport Group, Xu Long, former chairman of China Mobile Guangdong Company, and Chen Chunyang, chief financial officer of Zixing Electric Power Company, etc., all made people indignant. These phenomena further reflect that the power supervision system of monopoly enterprises needs to be improved urgently. ? Monopoly enterprises, especially state-owned monopoly enterprises, such as central enterprises, have a dominant position in the market because of the policy shelter given by the government and the formation of a system without competition and pressure. When all the rights and resources are in the hands, but the supervision and restriction are not in place, and they pursue their own interests, the black-box operators will inevitably be everywhere. Monopoly enterprises have the monopoly power of the market and absolute control over market resources, and their excessive rights and nature provide a foundation for corporate executives to engage in corruption. As a result, the executives of monopoly enterprises constantly enrich themselves by taking bribes, and monopoly opens the door for them. Therefore, the corruption of executives in monopoly enterprises emerges one after another. Monopoly has become a hotbed of corruption, which not only affects economic development, but also damages the government's credit and loses trust in operators. Corruption harms the interests of consumers from the root, and ultimately harms the economic interests of the country. ?