? In the process of human development, competition is an eternal topic, and there is a very classic "prisoner's dilemma" in game theory. Therefore, every prisoner is faced with two choices: confession or denial. But no matter how the partner chooses, the best choice for every prisoner is confession: if the partner denies it, he will be released if he confesses, and if he denies it, he will be sentenced to ten years. Confession is better than no confession; If your partner confesses and confesses himself, you will be sentenced to eight years. Confession is better than denial. As a result, both suspects chose to confess and were sentenced to eight years in prison. If both of them deny it, it is obviously a good result to sentence them to one year each.
Secondly, the profound problem reflected by the prisoner's dilemma is that the individual rationality of human beings sometimes leads to the collective irrationality-smart human beings will be trapped by their own cleverness or harm the collective interests.
For us college students, the concept of involution seems to have become a derogatory term. Even many students have maintained a high learning efficiency during their freshman year, preparing for future postgraduate study and gathering in the library every day. It's not that I don't advocate this attitude towards life, but I want to make it clear that students with high learning efficiency know when to combine work and rest, and proper relaxation can improve our efficiency more effectively. Don't be brainwashed by the idea that others will roll me down, which will solidify invisibly.
Finally, resources are limited and competition is infinite, so it is undeniable that involution is "irrational", but it is the necessity of human nature. In any case, for us college students, involution does not mean blindly hitting a wall.