The promotion of separate dining system should be based on the most basic dining habits, that is to say, only when the public can accept such a dining habit can the market respond accordingly, otherwise the original dining culture will still be maintained, which is difficult to be promoted.

The spread of this epidemic has also brought the concept of separate meal system back into everyone's eyes, and they think that separate meal system is very necessary.

We in China pay attention to a lively meal. We gather around and eat something on a plate. This has been the way of eating since ancient times. Only in this way can we show the sense of closeness between people. If the sense of closeness does exist, how can food safety be guaranteed?

Just think about it. A table of people eats around a dish, and chopsticks touch other dishes on the plate after dipping their saliva. That is to say, if 11 people eat vegetables on a plate, it is equivalent to eating the saliva of 9 other people, and body fluids are also an important way for pathogens to spread.

I have a friend who runs a restaurant. I asked him if he could promote the separate dining system from the perspective of catering stores. My friend also said that it was very difficult, because it involved a cost problem. The separate dining system meant that there were more tableware, and tables might not be enough. The most important thing was that there were not enough waiters. Everyone had to order a meal, and the kitchen might be too busy. Think about how many dishes they had to arrange.

if it's really a separate meal system, it can only be achieved by raising the price.

personally, I don't think it is necessary to have separate meals in the family, but it is really necessary to have separate meals in other occasions. This kind of eating habit is more hygienic. As long as everyone can accept this kind of eating habit, it is no problem, and I am afraid that it will not be culturally integrated.