positive; In modern times, people have proved that superstition is not desirable through the development of science and technology, and they should create their own lives through their own hands. In ancient times, many people were seriously ill, and doctors could do nothing but watch patients die painfully. But now, through the development of science and technology, most intractable diseases have been successfully cured, and people don't have to worry about getting sick. ..... The above examples are just the tip of the iceberg of the case that the development of science and technology has benefited mankind. The rapid development of science and technology is beyond the imagination of ancient people. Why do TV and newspapers talk about promoting the development of science and technology almost every day, because how is the dream of flying for thousands of years round? Is the development of science and technology; What caused the convenience of communication? Is the development of science and technology; Why can seriously ill people live a happy life again? It is the development of science and technology! If the development of science and technology is wrong, then why should inventors and scientists such as Galileo, Newton, Edison, Madame Curie and Einstein dedicate their precious lives to science? Why spend so much precious time on the "wrong" cause? Don't they have judgment? Who thinks that their deaths are worthless, and who thinks that their dedication to science is meaningless at all?

the opposing argument: we don't deny that the development of science and technology has brought benefits to our lives. However, we believe that the disadvantages brought by science and technology outweigh the benefits. First, although cars facilitate our travel, the exhaust from archways causes environmental pollution and affects human health. Secondly, the appearance of entertainment facilities such as television has brought convenience to people, but it has invisibly blocked the communication between people, which is weak. There is also the appearance of the internet. It is undeniable that some lawless elements have an opportunity to disrupt people's lives and wait for a series of side effects brought by your so-called high technology. How can we sit idly by?

Three arguments: Of course, the development of science and technology has also caused some negative effects, but these effects should have been very small, but human beings are like a magnifying glass, magnifying these negative effects. If humans can consciously reuse plastic bags instead of littering them, will it cause such serious white pollution? If mankind can exploit resources exhaustively, will it cause the current shortage of resources? If humans can save water and factories don't discharge sewage illegally, will it cause serious water shortage now? There are many such things going on, and some people not only don't introspect, but blindly point the responsibility at "technology". I feel ridiculous and hopeless for these people.

Three opposing arguments: Just now, the opponent's argument is just a hypothesis. Please come back to reality. What would it take to publicize and protect the environment without the obstruction of science and technology? Besides, the current network problem is exactly what everyone is worried about. Many teenagers who should be happy in the motherland have gone astray and embarked on the road of crime. You said that although the network can facilitate us to find information, how can such a small advantage be compared with the future of the motherland?

Four arguments: However, the development of science and technology has more benefits. The launch of rockets has fulfilled the centenary dream of China people, and the completion of the Bird's Nest Water Cube has fulfilled China's Olympic dream. How can China people realize their dreams without science and technology? Why should we hold on to the problem of network?

four arguments against each other: the other side argues that the network problem is of great importance. Teenagers are the flowers of the motherland, and the future of the motherland depends on teenagers. The network has led teenagers into confusion, and how many teenagers can't extricate themselves from it? If the next generation of the motherland is addicted to the network, how can our motherland realize more dreams? I would like to ask the other debater.

Let's argue in the affirmative: We are happy, we are lucky, and we have caught up with an era of rapid development of science and technology, an era full of high technology. This is not only because our ancestors chose development and progress in evolution, but also because of all people's unremitting efforts and hard study. How many hard-working scientists have exchanged their wisdom and even their lives today. Because of Faraday, our life is full of all kinds of electrical appliances; Because of Darwin and Mendel, we can better understand ourselves and know ourselves; Because of Bian Que, because of Hua Tuo, because of Li Shizhen, our lives can be guaranteed. Isn't everything around us bought by them? Life is so comfortable, life is so pleasant and life is so wonderful. Our average life expectancy is 31 years higher than that in ancient times, and we don't even have to go out to visit relatives and friends. Isn't this all the benefits brought by the development of science?

opposing argument: in primitive times, human beings only needed the resources on the surface of the earth to live, and they only needed the living resources such as streams, fruits on trees, grass seeds, etc., which were also very enjoyable. Later, tools appeared, and then the resources were used to break ground by one foot. Later, coal mines, metals and other resources went down to the end of 1,111 meters, and then they went down to 5,111 meters. When human beings used the core, they asked for resources from the depths of the earth at an accelerated pace.

pro-arguer: As long as we control science and technology, the earth will not be destroyed.

Pro-arguer: The development of science and technology has certainly caused some negative effects, but these effects should have been small, but human beings are like a magnifying glass, magnifying these negative effects. If humans can consciously reuse plastic bags instead of littering them, will it cause such serious white pollution? If mankind can exploit resources exhaustively, will it cause the current shortage of resources? If humans can save water and factories don't discharge sewage illegally, will it cause serious water shortage now? There are many such things going on, and some people not only don't introspect, but blindly point the responsibility at "technology". I feel ridiculous and hopeless for these people.

Three opposing arguments: Just now, the opponent's argument is just a hypothesis. Please come back to reality. What would it take to publicize and protect the environment without the obstruction of science and technology? Besides, the current network problem is exactly what everyone is worried about. Many teenagers who should be happy in the motherland have gone astray and embarked on the road of crime. You said that although the network can facilitate us to find information, how can such a small advantage be compared with the future of the motherland?

Four arguments: However, the development of science and technology has more benefits. The launch of rockets has fulfilled the centenary dream of China people, and the completion of the Bird's Nest Water Cube has fulfilled China's Olympic dream. How can China people realize their dreams without science and technology? Why should we hold on to the problem of network?

four arguments against each other: the other side argues that the network problem is of great importance. Teenagers are the flowers of the motherland, and the future of the motherland depends on teenagers. The network has led teenagers into confusion, and how many teenagers can't extricate themselves from it? If the next generation of the motherland is addicted to the network, how can our motherland realize more dreams? I would like to ask the other debater.

Let's argue in the affirmative: We are happy, we are lucky, and we have caught up with an era of rapid development of science and technology, an era full of high technology. This is not only because our ancestors chose development and progress in evolution, but also because of all people's unremitting efforts and hard study. How many hard-working scientists have exchanged their wisdom and even their lives today. Because of Faraday, our life is full of all kinds of electrical appliances; Because of Darwin and Mendel, we can better understand ourselves and know ourselves; Because of Bian Que, because of Hua Tuo, because of Li Shizhen, our lives can be guaranteed. Isn't everything around us bought by them? Life is so comfortable, life is so pleasant and life is so wonderful. Our average life expectancy is 31 years higher than that in ancient times, and we don't even have to go out to visit relatives and friends. Isn't this all the benefits brought by the development of science?

opposing argument: in primitive times, human beings only needed the resources on the surface of the earth to live, and they only needed the living resources such as streams, fruits on trees, grass seeds, etc., which were also very enjoyable. Later, tools appeared, and then the resources were used to break ground by one foot. Later, coal mines, metals and other resources went down to the end of 1,111 meters, and then they went down to 5,111 meters. When human beings used the core, they asked for resources from the depths of the earth at an accelerated pace.

Argument for the positive side: As long as we control science and technology beneficially, the earth will not be destroyed.

For the negative side; Science and technology are the primary productive forces, and high-tech and its industries have promoted the development of national economy. It can be said that high-tech and its industries have become the locomotive of contemporary scientific and technological development. Science and technology have changed people's ideas, improved people's living standards and promoted the development of socialist civilization. Scientific development can reflect a country's economic development level and national economic literacy. Science and technology are the primary productive forces, the concentrated expression and main symbol of advanced productive forces. I said that to develop productive forces and improve economic benefits, we must first rely on the development of science and technology. From the elements of productive forces, science and technology can continuously improve and update labor tools, improve the quality of workers, and make full use of labor objects. In short, the development of science and technology can greatly liberate productive forces, even create new industrial sectors and lead to the rapid development of the national economy. We must adhere to the strategy of rejuvenating the country through science and education, so that the economic growth mode can get rid of the extensive old road and shift to the track centered on improving economic efficiency. It is indispensable to pay attention to the quality and efficiency of economic development TV in life. We can watch the news and learn about things at home and abroad; You can watch cartoons and relax; You can also not go to the scene to watch programs and performances; For example, when the mascot of the Olympic Games is announced, we can watch the broadcast at home, and a series of technologies really bring us benefits, so we insist that the development of science and technology has both advantages and disadvantages!

Four arguments against it: In today's society, science is developing rapidly, and many high-tech products are constantly emerging. Computers, cars, dishwashers, washing machines ... have entered the lives of ordinary people. They do bring a lot of convenience to our lives, but at the same time, they also gradually lose the basic abilities of human beings. With computers, people no longer use their brains to think about things, because they can do it by using computers; With cars, people are no longer used to walking and taking a walk, but driving for a ride instead; With dishwashers, people no longer wash dishes by hand. Maybe one day, people will forget how to wash dishes. The development of science and technology makes people happy and worried. Happily, it provides the greatest convenience for our life. Worryingly, it will one day make computers replace the human brain and machines replace the hands. At that time, the world will no longer be dominated by human beings who think they are smart, but by machines invented by human beings! Therefore, I think: the development of science and technology will inhibit the all-round development of people!

·············································································································································