disposable fast food boxes produce white pollution; Making chainsaws has brought convenience to people, but it is also destroying forests; Beer gives people a kind of enjoyment, but it is often this guy who makes the goods. Science is neither good nor bad, it depends on how you treat it.

Cars and air conditioners bring convenience to people, but they pollute the environment at last.

Science makes people stronger. Stronger people can do more things, and of course they will do more bad things.

Animals died out one after another during the British industrial revolution

The energy crisis and the harm of medical and biological experiments to experimental animals and human bodies.

■ Pro: When human beings sing a triumphant song for science and technology, please don't forget that science and technology can also give evil hearts the devil-like power

Human beings will be destroyed by science and technology, which is also based on the all-round distortion of human development by modern science and technology, which is concentrated in social relations, spiritual fields and ethics

■ Pro: Science and technology is the strongest shield to protect human beings, and we believe that science and technology will continue to improve. Will certainly bring mankind into a more beautiful and mysterious realm

Human beings will not be destroyed by science and technology, because the course of scientific and technological development has proved that the magic height is one foot, the Tao height is one foot, and the problems brought by science and technology to human beings can be solved through the further development of science and technology itself.

Wu Tian (a positive argument): First of all, everything has its pros and cons, and I don't need to waste my breath on the benefits of science and technology. Later, the other debaters will be eloquent. Different from other things, the opposite of science and technology is as sharp as a blade and as sharp as a sword, which is what we often call a double-edged sword. However, if you think that human beings have been soberly aware of the existence of a double-edged sword, then you are somewhat naive. When human beings proudly say time and time again that new technologies are being applied at the fastest speed, which shows how efficient we humans are, have you ever thought that it also means that it is too late to understand the negative effects of science and technology, or you don't want to know at all. It is the beginning of the disaster that the destruction of science and technology reflects the irreversible trend.

second, the uncertainty of the development of modern science and technology makes the double-edged sword of science and technology become the sword of Damocles. The use of science and technology by human beings has long been impatient. After years of accumulation, the negative effects of science and technology are erupting on a global scale at any time, which is a deeper crisis of the destructive trend of science and technology.

thirdly, the high dependence on science and technology makes the sword of Damocles ready to move. The subjective dependence caused by human's high trust in science and technology enables the sword to wield its power at will, which directly leads to the fact that science and technology have the power to destroy human beings. When human beings sing a song of triumph for science and technology, please don't forget that science and technology can also give evil hearts the power of the devil.

Zheng Wei (opposing argument): First of all, we should point out that the negative effects of science and technology can't be attributed to science and technology. On the contrary, it is the evil result of mankind's failure to understand the world scientifically as a whole and unreasonable use of science and technology.

Second, the other debater overestimated the difficulties brought by science and technology, but underestimated the ability of human beings to solve these difficulties. The scientific and technological problems that cannot be solved at present do not mean that they cannot be solved in the future. We believe that mankind will not be destroyed by science and technology, because the course of scientific and technological development has proved that the magic height is one foot, the road height is one foot, and the problems brought by science and technology to mankind can be solved by further development of science and technology itself. In the 1971s, scientists predicted that human beings would face an energy crisis by the beginning of the 21th century due to the excessive consumption of natural resources by scientific and technological products. Now, the development of energy and micro-solar energy has made this panic disappear.

Third, science and technology are in the hands of human beings, who can create a scientific prevention system through ethics and legal norms, so that the negative effects brought by individual technological inventions can be restricted in the whole system.

Jane Anjun (positive and negative arguments): The other debater said that human beings have moral laws, but can moral laws control science and technology? When scientists copy people on the high seas, moral laws can't be managed. We believe that mankind will be destroyed by science and technology, and it is also based on the all-round distortion of human development by modern science and technology, which is concentrated in three aspects: social relations, spiritual field and ethics. First of all, the development trend of science and technology has the potential to destroy human social life. Secondly, the destructive power of science and technology is also reflected in its constant impact and destruction on human life, which is concentrated in the two new favorites of human science and technology, the Internet and gene technology. The warriors of the Internet have long announced that they will turn the Internet into a kind of life. However, when the virtual replaces the real, the existence of people as a society will disappear. As the saying goes, if the skin does not exist, how can the hair be attached? Look at gene technology, life science and technology treat diseases, but on the other hand, it is interfering with nature and making more perfect human beings. But is the perfect person of genetic modification human or high-tech products? Today, the change of gene technology to human inner nature directly impacts the last line of defense of human spiritual home-ethics. The all-round distortion of science and technology to human society is destroying our social foundation and spiritual world.

Zhang Wenbo (opposing debate): Just now, the other debater greatly exaggerated the negative impact of science and technology on human beings. Although we can't completely rule out the possibility that high technology will bring negative impact on human beings, any scientific and technological achievement may have both advantages and disadvantages, and the impact does not mean destruction.

First of all, science and technology are the driving force of human progress.

Secondly, without science and technology, human beings would have died long ago. Science and technology is the strongest shield to protect mankind. We believe that the continuous improvement of science and technology will surely bring mankind into a more beautiful and mysterious realm, so we believe that mankind will not be destroyed by science and technology.

Fu Xin (three arguments for the positive side): Just now, the other debater made two mistakes: First, the other debater really talked about the benefits of science and technology, but we don't deny the benefits of science and technology. It's just that the other debater really thinks that water can carry a boat, but water must not overturn it? Second, the other debater said that human beings are rational, but rationality does not mean that they will not perish. Below I will demonstrate our proposition from the development trend of modern science and technology.

first, the development of science and technology is moving from individual trend to national trend and social trend. Personal pursuit and dependence on scientific and technological life is not a big problem. The problem is that this pursuit and dependence is becoming a national trend and a social trend in the form of a unique value. Science and technology has become the only correct direction in this world, and all thoughts that go against it must make way for it.

Second, the destructive trend of science and technology is manifested in the deification of science and technology, while nature is instrumentalized. It is science and technology that makes human beings no longer feel that they are a part of nature. It is science and technology that makes human beings feel that they have a new God in their hands and constantly instrumentalize nature. However, when the natural order is broken, where will mankind stand?

Ji Xing (three opposing arguments): Just now, the other debater blamed all the mistakes on science and technology, which was one-sided, and did not really understand the relationship between science and technology and human beings. Science and technology is not water, and human beings can control it. The development of everything has its negative side.

I will explain our views from a realistic perspective. First, the development of high-tech has made human beings get unexpected gains. According to Zhongxin. com, robots assisted in minimally invasive surgery in China for the first time; Nature magazine reported that a nano-cow with the size of a cell was finally born. All these achievements brought by science and technology have pushed mankind to a more prosperous starting point.

Second, we should solve our existing problems with current high technology. Undoubtedly, many problems will be solved with the continuous development of science and technology, ranging from garbage to energy crisis.

thirdly, the level of scientific and technological development of human beings in a few years' time is believed to be unimaginable to all of us here. Just like the human beings who were drilling for fire in the Stone Age, it is impossible for them to imagine. Now our world already has gas and electricity. Human beings will not be destroyed by science and technology, on the contrary, science will only make human beings progress more and more.

Confrontation

■ Zheng Fang: Look at today's genetic technology, which has already impacted ethics, the last line of defense of human spiritual home. What should you do?

■ Counterparty: Humans can control science and technology, and humans will not be destroyed by science and technology

Chen Xiaohuan: May I ask the other debater, is it a trend to talk about "Jiang" today?

Wang qingmei: of course, we are talking about the trend, and the trend we are talking about is based on finding our basis to talk about the future in history and reality.

Jane Anjun: Thank you for agreeing with us. When talking about the future, of course, we should look at the trend, take reality as the basis and judge by the trend. Why can't the other debater see the devastating trend of science and technology?

Ji Xing: But the other debater just ignores history. We should prove from the historical perspective that technology will not destroy mankind.

fu Xin: is the opponent's debater called trend? The opponent's argument is called looking at history and imagining the future.

Zheng Wei: The other debater, we at least based our inference on history, but the other debater made a guess out of thin air. No wonder the other debater used this unscientific method to reach this unscientific conclusion.

Wu Tian: We obviously look at the trend based on reality. Why can't the other debater see it? Excuse me, today's technology has developed independently. Isn't this a destructive trend?

Wang qingmei: I'd like to ask my opponent, if you want to evaluate the stock market, can you not look at the past historical data?

Chen Xiaohuan: The other debater kept telling us today how good technology is, but is it impossible for good and bad to coexist? Can't good and bad coexist and be destroyed?

Zheng Wei: We don't deny that good and bad coexist, but we believe that human beings can control science and technology, and they will not be destroyed by science and technology.

Jane Anjun: If the opponent really thinks that human beings can control science and technology, please tell us clearly how to control it.

Wang qingmei: the other debater has been listing all kinds of negative effects brought by science and technology, and has been telling about the dangers of genetic technology, completely ignoring the great contribution made by genetic technology to human beings. If genetic technology is useless, why did it take Singapore National Institute of Education ten years to develop the world's first "Hu Qi Hua" with transgenic technology? Please explain.

Chen Xiaohuan: We don't deny the benefits brought by science and technology, but can't I stab you while I hug you? Do you mind if I give you a hug and stab you?

Zheng Wei: Up to now, the other debater has been avoiding our question. If mankind will be destroyed by science and technology, does the other debater think that the five-year plan of science and technology implemented by the Singapore government is accelerating this destruction?

Jane Anjun: There is no contradiction between the implementation of the scientific plan and the fact that mankind will be destroyed by science and technology. We stand here today, and we just want to understand this trend. The other debaters have not seen this trend yet. Why should we talk about the problems after the trend?

Wang qingmei: the other debater's opinion is that since technology is useless, should we stop developing technology?

Fu Xin: The logic of the other debater is really strange. On the one hand, he has not realized the existence of the problem, and on the other hand, he is asking me how to solve the problem. It is really strange that he wants to run before he can leave.

Zheng Wei: We think it is even more strange for the other side to argue. On the one hand, it is said that mankind will be destroyed by science and technology, on the other hand, it is not contradictory to continue to develop science and technology without giving up.

Wu Tian: It's not that we are contradictory, but that people have to bow their heads under the trend. Look at today's genetic technology, which has already impacted ethics, the last line of defense of human spiritual home. What should you do?

Wang qingmei: I would like to ask the other side, four debaters with scientific literacy. Since science and technology will destroy mankind, why do we study science and technology so hard?

Summary

■ Pro: Science and technology have brought convenience to mankind, but at the same time they have sown the seeds of destruction

■ Counter: We should pursue the truth, but we must never take individual phenomena as universal, and it is impossible to see the world through the eye of a needle

Wang Qingmei (four arguments of the counter): Here I want to point out three serious mistakes made by the other debater: First, summarize the whole story by points. One-sided emphasis and infinite exaggeration of the negative effects of science and technology.

second, it is taken out of context, because there are some problems in the development of science and technology, it is asserted that science and technology will destroy mankind, completely ignoring the binding and guiding role of humanistic spirit and ethics in science and technology.

Third, the other side is looking at things with a stagnant eye, and only points out the existing problems of science and technology, while we point out the innovative nature of science and technology from the perspective of development. Modern science and technology brings us ever-changing changes and newer and faster methods to solve problems.

I will summarize our views as follows: First, human beings are rational, otherwise there would be no birth of science and technology. We should pursue the truth, but we must never take individual phenomena as universality, nor can we see the world through the eye of a needle.

second, technology is controllable. at this point, we have listed a lot of facts. What I want to emphasize here is that the existing problems can be completely controlled through human self-discipline and the development of science and technology. Under the double insurance of human reason and the development of science and technology, human beings will not be destroyed by science and technology.

Chen Xiaohuan (four arguments for the positive side): First of all, the other side told us how good the technology will be in the future, but the word "Jiang" in today's debate tells us to stand today and see tomorrow instead of standing tomorrow.

Then the other side told us from a historical perspective that we don't deny the benefits of science and technology, but no matter how many benefits it has, it can't cover up its disadvantages. The focus of today's debate is whether the disadvantages brought by science and technology will destroy mankind, but the other debater has repeatedly talked about him. Argumentation is the second biggest mistake made by the other debater.

Then the other party naively told us that the development of science and technology can be controlled by human beings, but what we see is that science and technology is determining the strength and status of politics, economy and even a country. It has long been above all moral, legal, rational conscience. What else can control it?

To sum up our point of view, first of all, technology has brought convenience to mankind, but it has also sown the seeds of destruction. Now everyone dares to say that science and technology are people-oriented. Is serving people called people-oriented? Secondly, science and technology are deified, but people are instrumentalized, and everything is given priority to science and technology. Such examples abound in the world around us. Science and technology was originally just a tool, but when it is deified and people are instrumentalized, such human beings are a kind of destruction. Third, science and technology are dominating the fate of mankind with unprecedented power. The independence of scientific and technological development has long exceeded human control, but in turn dominates human beings. Science and technology is only a means, not an end. Only after we dare to admit the existence of this devastating trend can we tell you that the road is long and Xiu Yuan is Xi, and I will explore the harm to nature from top to bottom:

Just like any industrial product we use. A few years ago, the impact of air conditioning on nature mainly focused on the destruction of the earth's ozone layer by refrigerants, but these