It is a matter of course to give money for dinner, but after eating, you have to pay for the meal you ordered. You can't point the finger at the merchant just because the price is not within your expected range, or even explain the whole thing clearly, giving everyone a misleading psychology, which will affect the normal operation and business of the merchant to a certain extent. Faced with this phenomenon, the store can't bear it. It explained all the causes and effects of the incident, let everyone know the true story of the incident, and let some people see the true face of this consumer.
If you don't buy this vendor's seafood, you still have to pay so much money even if you buy it in the supermarket. After all, seafood is very expensive due to the outbreak of the epidemic. If you find that there is no obvious price tag in the process of eating, you can seek legal help, but in the case of price tag, it is the consumer's own reason. You don't have to eat if you can't afford it. There is no need to discredit the business after eating.
The reason why this matter is constantly fermenting on the Internet is because the emergence of netizens has made this matter in a hot spot again and again. After all, the sky-high price of catering really makes the rights and interests of many consumers unprotected, but I also hope that everyone can ask the price in advance. Then you can have a corresponding understanding of your own consumption, and there will be no unexpected phenomena.