First, the first problem was solved, and Wang entered the restaurant to order. Legally speaking, Wang signed a contract with the restaurant. The terms of the contract are drawn up in advance and are standard terms. According to the relevant provisions of the Contract Law, the party providing the standard clauses should follow the principle of fairness to determine the rights and obligations between the parties, and take reasonable measures to draw the attention of the other party to the clauses exempting or limiting its liability, and explain the clauses according to the requirements of the other party. If the party providing the standard terms exempts the other party from liability, aggravates the other party's liability or exempts the other party's main rights, the standard terms are invalid. The restaurant obviously didn't remind Wang to take the main responsibility in a reasonable way, and the menu content obviously violated the principle of fairness, which aggravated Wang's responsibility and was invalid. Wang's claim should be supported.