Actually, this question is not true. Not only some people deny the theory of evolution, but also some people oppose the theory of relativity. Moreover, opposing and attacking Darwin, Einstein, Newton and other most famous scientists and their theories are the favorite of folk subjects.

Darwin, the originator of evolution, is respected and commemorated by the mainstream of human society.

Only some religious schools of ghosts and gods and their worshippers and fools are opposed to the theory of evolution. This is just a countercurrent in the history of human civilization and progress, and there will be several bubbles, which will never stop the mighty trend of progress.

There are also many people who deny Newton's classical mechanics, gravity and Einstein's theory of relativity. These people are the so-called "folk subjects", and they are also a small countercurrent like opposing evolution, which does not damage the greatness of these theories.

The plaintiffs are Li Zifeng, Huang Xinwei and Mei Xiaochun, who are said to be some prominent figures in the folk science. They and some folk heroes who came to help out gathered in the big bed room of Home Inn near the court to discuss how to deal with the trial. However, it deviated from the theme and began to denounce the mistake of relativity, thinking that it was outrageous.

This is the reason why a folk science student who came to help out spoke excitedly against the theory of relativity.

They have the plot and desire to express themselves in a hurry, waving their arms and scrambling to talk, with their voices higher than each other. And how to prepare for the trial is left behind.

In a school, a "people's subject" used the gap between classes to talk to students about fallacies and heresies against the theory of evolution. For this reason, Shell.com published an article to expose and refute these erroneous remarks. The students felt misled after reading it and reported the character to the school. The school punished him, canceled his substitute qualification and deducted 3% of his allowance.

So this man felt that he was Bruno who was being persecuted, and thus made Beijing Guoke Interactive Technology Media Co., Ltd. the first defendant.

These "people's subjects" sued for an apology in public and compensation of 5, yuan for spiritual comfort. Originally, they wanted to add more, but the lawyer said it was at the top.

this lawsuit is inconclusive for the time being.

The defendants' lawyers had prepared detailed pleadings, which were useless, because as soon as the trial began, they found that these plaintiffs did not elaborate and argue on the core issues and the controversial points of the original appeal at all, but kept chattering about things that had nothing to do with the case itself, and repeatedly questioned the impartiality of the judges.