Recently, this incident on the Internet and in reality was made boisterous, become the laughing stock of the public, the initial source is the name of Guo Ping's people in the "portrait of geography" magazine published an article titled "cooked eggs into raw eggs (eggs back to life)? Hatching chicks experimental report" article, and later by informed sources confirmed that the name of the person Guo Ping is Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, Chunlin vocational training school principal.

Friends who have read the article published by Guo Ping in the magazine will find it very funny. This principal blatantly said in the experimental report that they could pass the ? parapsychological conscious energy method? , to make hard-boiled eggs regenerate and successfully hatch chicks. It is now the year 2021, the 21st century, and the fact that such an anti-intellectual article has appeared is simply mind-boggling and laughable, which is simply insulting to people's intelligence.

The first is the person who published the article, the main author, Guo Ping. Guo Ping, as the principal of a training school and a person with a certain level of education, was able to write such an anti-scientific article, but also wanted to pretend to be stupid and hide it afterwards, which is obviously not a problem of intelligence, but a problem of moral character. As the principal of the training school, not only to teach, but also to establish people, and their own body is not correct, it is difficult to make progress in education, and will even mislead people. So I think Guo Ping as the first person responsible for this incident, but also the main responsible person, should be held accountable for its responsibility, so that it will bear the corresponding consequences.

Secondly, it is the people in charge of Portrait of Geography who allowed this article to be published. They either didn't review the article carefully enough and didn't fulfill their responsibilities, or they saw that the article didn't make sense but turned a blind eye to it because of the benefits and allowed it to be published. If it is the former, I think the punishment can still be light, if it is the latter, I think it should be heavily punished, after all, this has involved the issue of corruption, and it should be attacked with a heavy hand.