I am a professional camera maker. And now it specializes in beauty cameras. Now I have come into contact with the two machines you mentioned, TR5 and KW1 cameras. . If it is a comparison of arguments, including pixels and processing power, KW1 is stronger than TR5. In particular, the ability of beauty post-processing photos TR5 is very slow. . But from the rational point of view, KW1 seems to be just a slogan for * * *. Although the perfume bottle shape is designed. But still shooting from the front and back angles is not much different from mobile phones. . At this point, the TR5 looks much more powerful when shooting at random from all angles. Secondly, the beauty effect. For the beauty effect, TR5 belongs to the seventh generation of Casio beauty camera. This camera has three different effects: smooth panel, wheat color, natural, whitening and one-time shooting. It also merged the advantages of two machines, TR15 TR35. Did you eat wafer cakes when you were a child? ",and the design level of KW1 is not low, although there are not many bright spots. But its beauty effect is almost the same as that of 35. However, the functional options need to be improved. After all, KW1 is Sony's first beauty camera. . .

conclusion: if you are not short of money, I suggest you choose TR5. The artifact is the real artifact in one step. . . If you are considering ordinary travel and like to show off that you have * * * artifacts, you can consider KW1. .

Casio * * * artifact is better than Sony's micro-single

Emphasis is different. Casio TR series * * * artifact is a high-end consumer camera, which is more suitable for girls * * * and has some filter effects. From the aspects of function, control, sensor and lens, Sony's micro-single is definitely much higher than Casio TR series, but * * * is not as convenient as Casio. If you like photography, Sony's micro-single is more professional.

the * * * artifact, but I really don't know which is better, Sony or Casio.

Actually, I prefer Sony's because of its fresh color and beautiful design. Moreover, Sony itself is the world's largest camera cmos manufacturer, and Nikon uses Sony's cmos, so the quality is more guaranteed.

[Share] Which is better, Sony kw1 *** artifact or Casio?

If you want to be rich and beautiful, you must be TR5. If you want to be Zr 5, which is better, dooraa or Sony?

Sony, of course. Big brands deserve information. Japanese products are good. Do you dare to buy dooraa products? Wait for it to hit your hand!

Is Sony * * * artifact better or Casio?

Of course it's Sony's. Sony's new microstrip has quite a few flip screens, which are very suitable for * * *, such as a5 and a51.

In terms of efficiency, Sony's micro-single image quality far exceeds Casio's so-called artifact, after all, the size gap of photosensitive elements is very obvious.

In addition, Sony's model is more affordable than Casio's. Casio's model sells for more than 6, yuan, which is really cheat people.

on the whole, I believe you know which one to buy.

*** Artifact Casio or sony Black Card is better

*** Artifact is worthy of the name * * *. If you have more * * * at ordinary times, the micro-order is of little use to you. In fact, tr35 is a means for Japanese to make money in China, and the more you fry, the more expensive it is. I'm a girl, too, and I love * * *, but I really don't have any special feelings about artifacts, and I've decided to sell my artifacts and buy nex-5r ~ I'm just searching for information about 5r. When I see this question, by the way, answer it, hehe. Everyone has different values, depending on personal pursuit and preferences. I like * * *, but I also like to shoot landscapes, delicious food and small animals, so the artifact can't satisfy me at all. The reason why I like 5r is that it can * * * (with skin beautifying function) and has primary SLR imaging, etc., and its cost-effectiveness ratio is much higher. Isn't tr35 fired to almost 8 now? If I were you, if I really like the micro-bill, but I can't let go of the * * * artifact, I'd rather buy the micro-bill and use the remaining money to buy a second-hand tr1 or 15. Kill two birds with one stone. In fact, I think it won't take long for the artifact, and I always want to buy a camera in the end. When I bought the artifact, I always took it out every day. Now I don't touch it at all. After three minutes of heat, women's consumption concept is blind and impulsive. Oh, I just heard about it recently. As for Casio * * * artifact, only the first generation tr1 is really released and sold in Japan, and the following 15, 2 and 35 are all sold in China for the China market. I don't know, I heard it, but I think it's quite cheap anyway ... (Actually, I can analyze it from another angle. If you buy tr1, TR 15 and TR 2, you can at least make money by reselling them, no matter whether it's 1 or 1,, you won't lose money. But if you buy 35, the price has been fried to more than 7,9 now. After you start, you don't need it for a year or two. You want to sell it. More artifacts will be produced in the future. The more artifacts are produced, the lower the price will be, because there is competition, and the more people have artifacts in the future, the harder it will be to sell them. But if you are very rich, you can forget it. Wow, I think I'm wordy. In short, my point is that artifacts are not worth it. No one can be sure that he can love * * * until he is old. . .

I bought a mobile phone artifact, but the Sony mobile phone doesn't work. Why?

Because the camera that comes with Sony mobile phone does not support the volume button to shoot, please download the third-party camera software yourself.

Which is better than Sony's * * * artifact and Casio? It's best to analyze it from a professional point of view. Please score 1 points

Casio is better in terms of ease of use and functionality, and the software has a good whitening effect.

however, the prices of these machines are so high that there is no price-effectiveness ratio.

want to buy the * * * artifact? I don't know which one to buy. I bought Sony kw1 and I feel the effect is very general! Which artifact is better? 5 points

Hello, I suggest you consider starting with Mito mobile phone V4, which has 21 million pixels in front and rear, 26.7mm equivalent focal length, and a large aperture of F/2.2. With the brand-new Suoxi Milbeaut image processor+exclusive noise reduction technology of M-Lab+front soft fill light, its photo effect is comparable to that of the latest tr6, but its price is only half that of TR, which is quite cost-effective. Many Casio users have put Casio in the closet and used Mito mobile phones. At present, Mito mobile phones are also popular in online celebrity circle and entertainment circle. Needless to say, there was a beautiful photo taken by Mito at the wedding in Liu Shishi just past! In addition to * * *, even the video can be beautiful, but as long as there is enough space, you can record the beauty video for a long time, not just the beauty of photos, but also the beauty of videos! The rear photo is also quite beautiful, so it is enough to take a V4 when traveling. I suggest you pay attention to Sina Weibo @ Meitu mobile phone. At present, their official blog has a variety of travel photos forwarded by users, and the scenery is really beautiful. Hope to adopt, hope to adopt!