Uncle's little station sub has a video that made it to the top two of Guochuang's hot search list. up master in this video criticized the new "big head son small head father" series three view is not correct, the result of the comment area a bunch of netizens responded to the new "big head son small head father" verbal attack. As a national cartoon now broadcast on TV every day, why would the new "Big Headed Son, Little Headed Dad" attract so much controversy? The following is a detailed analysis, as follows:

The new "Big Headed Son Small Headed Dad" is the sequel to the old national comic "Big Headed Son Small Headed Dad". Although the plot of the old version of "Big Headed Son, Small Headed Dad" was more submissive and simpler, it is a childhood memory for many post-nineties and post-zero-zero-zeroes. And as a sub supply to the national cartoon did not drop wisdom operation, so in the childhood filter + quality of the work of the dual-support, the old version of the "big head son small head father" reputation is quite good. With the old version of the pearl in front, has been a long time do not watch TV animation after the 90s and after 2000, to the new "big head son small head father" naturally do not wait to see.

New "Big Headed Son, Little Headed Dad", for the sake of fun ignored the authenticity

Children watching the new "Big Headed Son, Little Headed Dad" and teenagers watching the new "Big Headed Son, Little Headed Dad", is completely two perspectives. Children watching the new "Big Headed Son Little Headed Dad" focus on fun, they like wild imagination, like pranks, like the big head of the son to win; teenagers watching the new "Big Headed Son Little Headed Dad" pay more attention to the authenticity of the new "Big Headed Son Little Headed Dad", they want to see from the new "Big Headed Son Little Headed Dad" grounded in the part of the. But the writer of the new "Big Headed Son, Little Headed Dad" serves the kids, so he definitely tries to fulfill the fun as much as possible, followed by the authenticity. For example, if Big Headed Son uses the family pots and pans as toys, kids will find it a problem, but teenagers will find him annoying.

New 'Big Headed Son, Little Headed Dad' Characters Deliberate, Ignore Logic

In order to better satisfy children's appetite, the new 'Big Headed Son, Little Headed Dad' further deliberate the character of the protagonist's family of three. Big Headed Son has become a complete bear in the new version, and kids love this uninhibited bear persona; Apron Mom plays the mediator of the bears in the new version, throwing tantrums at the drop of a hat; and Little Headed Dad plays the enabler of the bears in the new version, and often does stupid things with Big Headed Son. Some viewers who are concerned about the logic of reality can easily find out the fallacies, for example, the little head of the father a white-collar workers, even secretly take his son to break into the neighbor's house across the street.

The new "Big Headed Son, Little Headed Dad" is not an incorrect view of the world, it is standing in the children's view of the world

If we look closely at the new "Big Headed Son, Little Headed Dad" in the criticized trespassing on the neighbor's swimming pool, smashed the companion remote control helicopter and other stories, we will find that if we stand in the children's view of the world, these things are "not a problem! "Faced with the problem of trespassing, children will think: the neighbor's uncle's swimming pool is so big, I'm a cute little kid, he should let me in; faced with the problem of smashing the companion's toys, children will think: toys are broken is a normal thing, and his toys are not a big deal when they are broken.

The new Big Headed Son, Little Headed Dad can be said to be unworthy of criticism, or it can be said to be worthy of criticism. The reason it doesn't deserve criticism is because it reflects the children's outlook, so it's not "incorrect outlook" but "immature outlook". The reason why it deserves criticism is because as an animation, it has the responsibility to help children's viewpoints, and it shouldn't follow the children's viewpoints.