Because this person did not infringe kiku's reputation, but praised her all over. So this person can't figure out why kiku's team is so hard on him and wants to sue him. He said in the article that it may be because kiku's lawyers are employed all the year round, so they need to perform in court constantly. So he became their target.

In fact, this marketing number didn't write much, but praised kiku's good makeup artist throughout. I didn't say anything out of line. But kiku's team will sue him because this marketing number used two photos of kiku in these two articles. So kiku sued the marketing number for infringing his portrait right. But as a star. His image will certainly be reported by some media. The media used his photos, how can it be said that it violated his portrait rights? It just introduces him.

And this marketing number is not available. Speak ill of the plot, the whole article is good about kiku. The author of this marketing number doesn't understand, why do you have to fuck him? But the court is still fair. Not only stiff, but also failed in the first trial and the second trial. This marketing number is a waste of his lawyer's fees. If this marketing number speaks ill of kiku in its own article, it may still be punished. But it doesn't matter whether he speaks well or not. Moreover, as a news media, the marketing number must have reported something on the news, so it does not belong to the privacy of the star, so it does not infringe any rights of the star.

If this lawsuit is won, other marketing numbers will never dare to say anything about stars, even if it is a good word, because as long as they report their affairs, they will infringe on their rights. Fortunately, the lawsuit was not won. It also earned a lot of heat for kiku.