Chicken Soup for the Soul has stress-relieving properties.
First defense information organized.
Good day President, good day everyone, around today's debate, our point of view is that Chicken Soup for the Soul is not nutritious.
First of all, to begin with, the chicken soup of the soul refers to the words that cater to the other side in order to appease the negative emotions of the moment, which is the subjective need of the individual, with blindness, one-sidedness, irrationality and incitement.
While the concept of nutrition in biology is to maintain the basis of the functioning of the organism, it has a universal significance, and is objectively needed for people to grow and progress, so that they can make substantial growth and progress.
Next I will argue from the following two aspects of our point of view, the first of which is that Chicken Soup for the Soul on the surface gives us a relaxed and happy mood, but in fact, it is a weakening of the difficulties we encounter in the current environment, and it is a constant paralysis of the self.
People in the trough like to listen to some of the empty surface of the chicken soup slogans, listen to the chicken soup only a short period of time out of some of the ideas but did not start to implement, that is, did not change their status quo. As summarized on the Internet, the phrase: "indirect ambition, continuity of eating and waiting for death".
Chicken Soup for the soul only for us to depict the beauty of Rome, but did not tell us exactly how to go to Rome, can not make people realize the root of the problem, that is, no practical guidance. Even though Chicken Soup for the Soul will ease our mood temporarily, it ignores the gap between reality and the story as well as individual differences, and will give people a misleading impression, even after reading too much Chicken Soup for the Soul.
We will slowly transform into a chicken soup type of thinking, the blind encouragement of chicken soup addiction, so that their own full of unrealistic and beautiful fantasies to become eye-catching. The real motivation is only a hair's breadth away from the chicken soup. The real motivation is not only to give us spiritual comfort but also to give us the right way to solve the problems of the moment.
Secondly, the chicken soup of the soul is only what people subjectively want rather than what they objectively need, subjectively want only the identity of the inner desire, is blind and one-sided, no scientific, and objectively need to make the foundation of the physical and mental health, is to maintain the physical and mental activities of nutrition, as eating junk snacks, only to satisfy our appetite, which is what we subjectively want.
But eating junk snacks will not only not let the body develop and grow, and may even affect the body's functions, which is not our objective need for nutritional analogies, the chicken soup can only stir up our emotions and thus in a particular period of time to cause people's **** woo no objective need to solve the problem of the solution, not after any scientific certification, no authoritative data support.
Just a piece of gorgeous foam summarizes the above we can not deny that the chicken soup of the soul in a particular scenario for a particular group of people is a certain benefit, but the benefits are not equal to nutrition, such as depression drugs, it can make the depression patients to alleviate the disease.
But are depression drugs nutritious? Under the difficult life to look at the chicken soup for the soul is not wrong, but you can not take chicken soup for the soul, chicken soup for the soul can not solve your plight. Therefore, we insist that chicken soup is not nutritious.
The second and third defense information organization.
1. Chicken Soup for the Soul is designed to be comforting by appealing to people's minds and telling them what they want to hear, even giving up part of the truth sometimes, right? Please answer yes or no.
(No).
An old saying goes, "Fortunes come in twos, misfortunes go in twos," but Chicken Soup gently says, "God closes a door for you, but opens a window at the same time," so how do you explain this example.
(That is to encourage and comfort you).
Yeah, to encourage and comfort you even regardless of reason, are such blind words nutritious?
2. May I ask your side again, such blind encouragement will paralyze the audience and make them lose the opportunity to reflect on themselves, right? (No).
Please elaborate on why this would not happen.
(To give you encouragement and guidance).
But stuff like this just makes you blindly confident by ignoring the reality of objective resistance ah.
3. Nutrition is necessary for our survival and development, so is chicken soup? Please answer yes or no. (Yes).
You mean we can't live without chicken soup, right? Then the human race is too fragile. / (No).
Yes, chicken soup is not necessary for us to survive and thrive so chicken soup is not nutritious.
(If you answer chicken soup relieves stress).
Chicken soup can only serve as a stress reliever, but the fact of the matter is that people can still survive with stress and may even perform better under it.
Fourth defense information compiled.
The other side has downgraded the definition of un-nutritious indefinitely to the point where it causes them to not cite a single un-nutritious thing, because according to his context, it has a specific effect on a specific number of people in a specific situation, and then at some point in time, there's a specific effect on a specific number of people, there's a nutritious thing. And what in the world is not? The other apologist is simply telling us that chicken soup for the soul has a rationale for existence.
Existence is reasonable, he is in demand, but the problem is that this where the argument to nutrition, your side can not cite any definition of nutrition, is not your side in the definition of nutrition is not all erased? If the argument is nutritious, he has to have a general benefit, your side just says it makes his mood go from low to high, but that's called a use, it's not called a benefit.
In summary, we can clearly find that chicken soup is like erotic massage, where comfortable to give you where to press. And dry goods are like formal massage, where uncomfortable to give you where to press.
The essence of chicken soup does not lie in reasoning, its essence lies in making you happy. But is being happy the same as being nourished?
When faced with a problem, only debugging mentality, which is not at all what positive energy, but masturbation and negative, posing a kind of "Q spirit", the use of spiritual victory to persuade themselves and other people, how positive it can be? The real positive outlook on life is to go directly to face the problem, solve the problem, really can not solve then give up.
Accept the acceptance of the acceptance of the, and do not give in to it, and then consider other proven methods, this is the real positive energy, is not everyone to go to be Q, do not have to go to the solution is the best. The real to society, to each of us have nutrition is able to help us, guide us.
When faced with a problem, the first thing we should do is to stabilize emotions, rationally analyze the key to the problem, rather than further amplify the emotions, focus on their own emotions, and then from negative emotions to positive emotions. Such an approach will only allow these emotional people to focus further on their emotions rather than the solution to the problem the next time they encounter it.
This is just a metaphorical meaning, today we are discussing whether Chicken Soup for the Soul is nutritious or not, in fact, we are discussing whether the truths contained in these words are giving help or not. It is because the reason why we say in real life that bananas are nutritious and we want people to eat more of them, and the reason why the Tao Te Ching is nutritious.
We want people to read more, we when in life to a thing characterized as nutritious not nutritious, in fact, we have an inherent meaning, do we want to advocate that people go to see it, do we want to advocate that people go to eat it, do we want to advocate that people go to read it, we have our caring where it is, but in fact, in line with it?
Everyone here, frankly speaking, we are very lazy, that's why we often go to read chicken soup for the soul, because we are not willing to face the problem, but we tell you, chicken soup for the soul is not nutritious, is trying to tell you, although sometimes we are very lazy, sometimes we want to avoid, but don't use chicken soup for the soul has the nutritious to paralyze yourself, to comfort yourself, to simplify yourself non-stop, this is the the biggest joke of all.
1, self-paralyzing. , it's just pandering to your thinking, it's telling you what you want to hear, there is no realistic guidance and the root of the problem, blindly addictive and eye-rolling. A defense.
2, non-objective needs, can not solve the dilemma. (Often there may be bad, plus examples, avoiding the real problem. People are often in a bad mood is encountered a variety of problems, like physical pain, frustration and unhappiness is often an early warning mechanism, the real need is by this low to find the crux of the problem, plus examples.) A defense.
3, blind irrational guidance. Chicken soup of the mind do not know the specifics of each person, but also to undertake the sacred mission of soothing the heart and delivering positive energy, which determines its characteristics must be simple and easy to understand, catering to everyone's emotions.
Easy to form ****ing give people a sense of security. When you trust the chicken soup tend to forget that there is often a big gap between the stories he tells you and reality, and thus the reasoning he gives many times does not help guide your behavior instead of forming a misleading.
And the reality is very complex, chicken soup ignores the reality of other factors, guidance harmful. It reduces our motivation to solve problems, makes us become blindly confident, and even makes us believe in a guidance that does not match our situation at all.
4, simplify thinking. Can not improve and enrich the human mind, but to form a kind of kidnapping of the thinking mode, human weakness tends to simplify the problems they encounter, we need to understand the world and ourselves more, when accustomed to this mode of thinking, we will have a deeper understanding of the world and ourselves further and further away. To clear position, chicken soup of the mind does not have universal benefits instead of bad.
5, anti-chicken soup is more reasonable than chicken soup. God closed a door, but it opened a window for me. But God closed a door and let a dog out at the same time is more consistent and reasonable.
6. The difference between being useful and being nutritious: If something is only useful to a particular group of people in a particular situation, it cannot be called nutritious. Nutritious is such as apples, bananas, etc., although we can not logically we require 100 percent of the people who eat it has a benefit, but in non-specific circumstances it is beneficial to everyone. A thing has to be universally beneficial.
PS: Additional information
The four deadly sins of chicken-soup writing: untruthfulness, unattractiveness, bigotry, and usurpation.
Canfield is no less than a chicken-soup veteran. The first and later stages of his life's work represent the two basic types of "chicken soup": psychological comfort and motivation. In the way of expression, he also shaped the basic stylistic characteristics of "chicken soup": sensational storytelling and excessive interpretation. Looking at these two types and characteristics together, we can summarize the abominations of "chicken soup":
One is "untruthfulness". The most typical is a vulgar story attached to the celebrities, Washington, Einstein, Su Dongpo, so-and-so Zen master, are the "hardest hit".
There is another kind, according to a fixed set of blind stories, regardless of reason and common sense. For example, the "expulsion of any doubtful thinking" article, wrote three frogs fell into the milk bucket, the first one resigned himself to his fate, directly waiting for death; the second carefully thought about his own ability to think that can not be, and then sank; the third kept stomping on the legs, and also self-motivated, and finally stirred the milk into the cream, and then jumped out of it.
The second is "unattractive". "Chicken soup" is usually neither inner nor outer beauty, not even bother to modify. So we often read such phrases: "countless dry goo, all turned into pieces of jade and silk." Their depictions are roughly at this level.
Third is "paranoia," which means over-explaining and treating the exceptional as the norm. For example, someone wrote about a worker who wanted to be a writer, writing day and night, but was always returned, when he was depressed, he threw the manuscript into the garbage can, and his wife picked it up from the garbage can, encouraging him to continue to write, and finally became a hit. This man's name is Stephen King (American best-selling author).
In the vast majority of cases, such writing will only lead to nothing. That's the nature of inspirational stories, because any kind of choice is the exception, not the rule.
So we can't learn solid historical knowledge and real life experience from "chicken soup", nor can we feel the beautiful rhetoric, nor can we gain real wisdom. In the United States, "chicken soup" is just a consumer product. But in China, "chicken soup text" has become an educational reading material for learning English and even part of the enlightenment discourse, which is "unauthorized". In short, "untruthfulness," "unattractiveness," "paranoia," and "overstepping" are the main characteristics of China's current "Chicken Soup" literature. The four major abominations of the "chicken soup article" in China nowadays.
So, if people believe in chicken soup, they will have a high degree of emotional acceptance. After all, they are talking about their own emotions that have been on their minds for a long time, but their moods are always up in the air because the problems remain unresolved, and in the end, they will be able to justify their behavior with a single sentence: "I'm a procrastinator.
This is why I hate chicken soup: they always choose some emotional people to deceive, these people would have been in a period of mood swings, when a person is emotionally unstable. If it's a general chicken soup writer, it's just a matter of deceiving for a while. When it comes to some of the so-called experts, the change is likely to be the reader's outlook on life, values, delay will be their whole life. To focus on criticality.