People are teachable, in what environment to form what kind of character. The younger siblings were each in charge in their early years, forming an extremely low self-esteem and also hurtful character. But the appearance of the role of brother-in-law, according to common sense, is completely enough to affect the family. And the plot also explains that Wentao after teasing the brother-in-law, convinced by the brother-in-law's way of dealing with things, and later to get the plot has also changed. This is a change, people grow up to understand things should be sensible, and brother-in-law has been teaching him. Brother-in-law's distinctive and contagious character is perfectly capable of teaching a child of Wentao's righteous character. But why did Wen Tao's character and the way he dealt with things return to the character he had before he had a brother-in-law when he grew up? Especially in the case of murder, this behavior should be the inevitable result of the previous character rather than the inevitable behavior of the "brother-in-law" after years of training. What does it mean to the plot to arrange for him to go to jail and not have his mom's funeral? When he came out, the house was empty, only brother-in-law alone, I would like to ask the writers, do you want to play a good man brother-in-law or the idea of telling everyone "good people do not necessarily have good karma"?
Moreover, Wen Yuan's character, a strong and vain personality, and selfishness, almost the accumulation of the two worst shortcomings of a woman's body, which ultimately led to her being spoiled and ruined her brother's life, while ending the life of her elder sister. After such things, the writers actually let her remain "unchanged" and "obsessed" until the end, without a trace of remorse. What is her significance? If it's just to emphasize the role of her brother-in-law, then it's too much.
Wen Hui's death is a turning point in the middle of the story. The death of a loved one should be the most shocking to everyone. However, the development of the second half of the plot left me puzzled as to why Wen Yuan would intensify his behavior and crown it as his brother-in-law's fault when it was clearly his own. Is human goodness really no match for human evil? Obviously it shouldn't be.
What's more, Wen Da has grown up to be the exact replica of Wen Yuan, who doesn't know how to read and write. He can't remember a single thing about his brother-in-law's kindness to him, and his own heart hasn't been strengthened at all by his studies, so he's a complete mess.
I just want to say, screenwriter ah, brother-in-law Hong Chang's life is still called life? What's the point of such a story? Portraying such a character makes me feel sad. Because the central meaning of the story is - good doesn't pay off. Such a life is a cup. But the reality is that people have a conscience, and those who can be like Wen Yuan Wen Da, if they live, can only be the very best.
All ah, screenwriters, write the story can not go too dramatic, because you are writing a life chapter. Not to mention the fact that it's called "Home Cooking", unless you're trying to convey that home cooking is a "nightmare" of a dish. If that's the case, then what's the point? Although every family has its own difficult experience, but it is always bitter sweet, can let people see the hope.