I was once obsessed with lecture halls, and I always felt that all the people watching this program were literati, and they chased after it. Until Yi Zhongtian was fired like a super girl, my heart was suddenly cold, and I always felt that being famous at once lacked accumulation like getting rich.
Yu Dan <: The Analects of Confucius > Experience is downloaded on the computer with BT, which is often used to appreciate the thick and confident speeches of women with good taste. Only those who are absolutely confident in themselves can tell the classics of Chinese studies so forcefully, and only diligent people can practice such fluent and clear eloquence. Only those who have reached this social status dare to talk about the topic of "calmness" with the people of the whole country so calmly.
The same book, everyone's personality and experience are different, and the interpretation is naturally different. Perhaps, it is also The Analects. Cynics read the harmony between man and nature, people who are eager for quick success and quick success read the calmness, people who are willing to be mediocre read the enterprising, people who lack strategy read the wisdom of life ...
Perhaps I don't appreciate the presentation of this book because of my overconfidence and self-expression. The few words are too sparse in typesetting; Originally, the thought that was not special and original was particularly gorgeous just because it was "under the light of sages". Imagine that if these views and stories explained in the book were linked to the Reader or some books about chicken soup for the soul, there is nothing wrong with it at all; Too frequent book signing also makes me feel too eager for quick success and instant benefit. The tone of "under the light of sages" makes me feel humble from my soul. It is possible to enlighten my mind with the thoughts of sages, but I can only be happy when my heart can shine, and I can never keep warm by myself under the light of sages.
I like a sentence quoted by the famous philosopher Feng Youlan in the book: explaining the old state to help the new life is extremely clear and the doctrine of the mean. The doctrine of the mean is "gorgeous and plain". So I think this book is more suitable for people who are already gorgeous. When those who used to follow for the sake of merit and profit, but now find that money, power and beautiful women can't fill their lives and make themselves happy, when they have a house, a new car, a stable family and a confidante who can arouse passion, tell them not to have too much fame and fortune in life, not to expect too much, and inner peace is the highest realm. For most ordinary people who are struggling in the most realistic state of life, how can they really be dull if they don't feel the splendor of their hearts?
This book talks about the topic of mentality, and the words that appear repeatedly in the book are such as calm, calm and calm. The point repeatedly mentioned is: Confucius told us that the standard of life is not to criticize the outside world, but to spend limited time and energy on "criticizing" the heart. She said that we can't control the outside world, so we can only make our inner choice stronger. However, the outside world is always dominated by people. When a person lives in a world that is always dominated by people, and constantly adjusts his own heart, is it possible to be happy? It is necessary to adapt to and face the society, and the heart that does not adapt to the society is bound to be unhappy, but criticizing the heart is by no means the way to adapt. Psychology talks about having a healthy and positive attitude, which emphasizes that we should be able to find a positive outlook on life from different angles in different living conditions, so that I can have enough courage to survive and have a happy experience. Yu Dan's experience in The Analects of Confucius more clearly expounds the way of regulating psychology of forgiveness and forbearance, which is similar to the spirit of Ah Q written by Lu Xun, and ignores the things that make him unhappy in the living environment. Who can do it? Isn't indifference to the surrounding gray environment a sign of decadence?
In other words, if, as the book says, happiness only depends on people's attitude towards the world, is it too idealistic? "The Doctrine of the Mean" is a key word to interpret China's philosophy or Confucianism. If I can interpret the beauty of "the Doctrine of the Mean", it should be a kind of harmony and integration. If a new term is used to explain it, it should be a kind of "* * * win". People and society win, and people and nature are mutually beneficial. In this book, I feel that the author overemphasizes introspection. The Confucian school founded by Confucius presents the state of being a man in society and the natural self advocated by Taoism, which we all need to experience and understand.
Writing here, I feel my point of view is clearer. I don't like Yu Dan's experience in The Analects of Confucius because I think such an interpretation should be told to those who are eager for quick success and instant benefit. And what I need more is more passionate and honed, more exciting and full of incentives. The doctrine of the mean is "gorgeous and plain". And I, how can I really be dull without experiencing a gorgeous mind?
Live healthy physically and mentally, and let yourself find happiness in your own way.