However, for the audience who have seen Conquest, there is actually a lot of confusion about this plot. In particular, many people think that Liu Huaqiang is really not a good person. Just because he bought a melon, he directly cut the stall owner.
In fact, there are not a few people who are puzzled. Although Liu Huaqiang's action is confusing, it is also the director's intention. Because when filming this story, it's not so simple, and there is a reason for Liu Huaqiang to chop down vendors. Later, his motivation was deleted for various reasons, and only then did he have a version that puzzled the audience.
While the audience was puzzled by this deletion, in fact, because of the abrupt plot, everyone believed that Liu Huaqiang was a bad guy, so they put all their energy into the plot of police and bandits. But in the original TV series, this paragraph is actually insinuating something, so I'll share the original story with you here.
In the full version of the story, Liu Huaqiang actually went to find this vendor on purpose, because his ex-wife once bought a melon at the booth here, and when she got home, she found that she was still a raw melon and an egg shaped thing. This is what Liu Huaqiang asked him: "Do you keep this melon cooked?" The origin of.
In addition, Liu Huaqiang didn't cut each other for no reason. At that time, Wang Sujuan bought raw melons and went to the stall owner's theory. Instead of admitting it, the other party molested Wang Sujuan. This just let Liu Huaqiang made such a outrageous thing.
This paragraph is the part of selling melons, which was deliberately deleted to make the role of Liu Huaqiang "extremely evil". Judging from the later reaction, it did achieve the effect of deletion. However, because of Sun Honglei's superb acting skills, everyone actually put this sentence "Do you keep this melon cooked?" As a daily expression.
At that time, this story was actually deleted for the sake of trial, because it was originally a police drama with difficulties in trial. If we add some problems such as short weight and bad vendors, there will definitely be more trouble in the audit. What's more, in the original plot, these bad guys were still cleaned up by Liu Huaqiang, a bad guy. From this point alone, it's a bit "embarrassed", so I'd better delete it.
Besides, it's not good for this story to have an impact, because we all know that this drama is based on the true story of a city. If we give the street vendor such an image, everyone will feel a little substituted, which will have an impact on their overall image in the future.
After combining various factors, Liu Huaqiang became a thoroughly bad person and a wicked person who deliberately found fault, because a melon cut down the vendor.
Of course, this drama has been broadcast for so many years, so many people may not believe it now. As for whether Liu Huaqiang took it out on his ex-wife or he found fault with him in the original version, there is no need to delve into it.
But when I first learned the original story of this paragraph, although I didn't read the full version, I also had a sense of picture in my heart. Because not to mention that era, even buying a melon now is the same as Wang Sujuan's experience. If this kind of thing happens to Liu Huaqiang, it's easy to do. If it's an ordinary person, then the money vendor will make so much money.