1. Interpretation difference:
-"have lunch "means" have lunch ",emphasizing the activity of having lunch, which usually includes a formal lunch.
-The definitions of "eat lunch" and "have lunch" are basically the same, which means "eating lunch" and emphasizes the act of eating lunch.
Example:
Let's have lunch together at the new restaurant. )
I usually have lunch at my desk. )
2. Usage difference:
-"have lunch "is usually used as a fixed phrases, which means to experience or participate in the activity of lunch.
-"eat lunch "is more direct, emphasizing the eating behavior of having lunch.
Example:
She usually has lunch with her colleagues. )
I need to eat lunch quickly because I have a meeting after. )
3. Use environmental differences:
-"have lunch "is more common in formal written and oral expressions, and is suitable for various occasions, including business, social and formal dining occasions.
-The usage of "eat lunch" is more common, which is suitable for daily spoken and informal written expression.
Example:
They invited her to have lunch at the fancy restaurant. )
I usually have lunch at home during the weeks. )
4. Difference of influence scope:
-"have lunch "may involve a wider range of lunch activities, including dining with others, business lunches or lunches on formal occasions.
-"eat lunch "generally refers to the individual's eating behavior, and its scope is relatively narrow.
Example:
They often have lunch meetings to discuss work. )
I like to eat lunch in the park on sunny days. )
5. Image difference:
-"have lunch "gives people a more formal and polite impression, and is suitable for business occasions or formal dining places.
-There is no obvious difference in the image of "eat lunch", which is more universal.
Example:
Let's have a business lunch to discuss the new project. )
I usually just eat lunch at my desk. )