Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Pregnant women's recipes - What policies does the term "iron rice bowl" reflect in our country during that historical period?
What policies does the term "iron rice bowl" reflect in our country during that historical period?

The term "iron rice bowl" comes from the beginning of reform and opening up.

Most of the enterprises at that time were state-owned.

The management system of state-owned enterprises is to eat from the "big pot".

Doing or not doing is the same thing, doing more or less is the same thing, doing good or bad is the same thing.

Salary increases are based on the year, and benefits are based on hair per head.

Almost every company has a large number of idlers, lazy people, mediocre people and casual people.

These people not only become a huge burden to the enterprise, but also directly affect the enthusiasm of producers and managers.

So someone suggested that this "big pot of rice" must be destroyed.

Unless the "iron rice bowl" is broken, enterprises will have no way out, and China will have no way out.

Soon, people invented the "contracting system".

Then, the "joint-stock reform" was carried out.

In this way, labor efficiency has increased, economic benefits have increased, and personal income has also increased.

So everyone said that this "iron rice bowl" was hit correctly and smashed well.

However, not enough attention has been paid to another "iron rice bowl", that is, the "iron rice bowl" in the civil service.

In recent years, we have been calling for administrative system reform.

The changes come and go, mostly through additions, subtractions, and mergers and acquisitions in the organizational structure.

Demolish some "old temples" and build some "new temples", or combine several "small temples" into one "big temple".

But the vital interests of the "monks" are basically not touched.

The management methods of most administrative agencies still follow the old path of state-owned enterprises more than 20 years ago.

As long as you enter this door, you will be served an "iron rice bowl".

No matter how much you work or how little you do, whether you work well or poorly, or whether you work or not, you will still get your salary and receive benefits when the time comes.

If you raise your salary, I will also raise my salary; if you share the New Year's goods, I will also share the New Year's goods.

No one should be missing, not a penny should be missing.

Of course, among the civil servants, the vast majority are good cadres and good public servants.

They founded the party for the public good and governed for the people. They worked diligently and conscientiously, served the people wholeheartedly, and did many practical things and good things for the people.

But there are indeed many people who are "eating for free" in there.

There is one kind of person who can't do anything, one kind of person who doesn't want to do anything, and one kind of person who has done some things but is "not clean" himself.

It is these three types of people that have damaged the image of the civil service.

Fear of risk is a human instinct.

Salaries in state-owned enterprises are low, foreign companies are unstable, and you have no capital to start your own business. If you lose money, you have to cry alone.

After all comparisons, being a civil servant is the safest.

As some university graduates said: "One effort can avoid a lifetime of risks." Compared with other professions, civil servants not only have stable positions and generous incomes, but also have easy work and have opportunities for promotion. .

Who among today’s young people, including their parents, still cannot figure out this debt? The hallmark of social progress is equal opportunities, equal pressure, and equal policies.

Further deepening the reform of the administrative system has been included in China's reform agenda.

Although some people call this reform a "deep water area," this step must be taken if we are to create a system of public opinion, a system of law, and an efficient system.

What needs to be broken is the "iron rice bowl" of enterprises, the "iron rice bowl" of industries and the "iron rice bowl" of departments.

In other words, it is to break the "iron rice bowl" of inefficiency and injustice.

At the same time, we must also establish an "iron rice bowl" for social justice, that is, the "iron rice bowl" for social security.

This "iron rice bowl" must be universal, complete and fair.

This is also often said, development is for the people, development depends on the people, and the fruits of development are enjoyed by the people.

Iron Rice Bowl - History and Problems After liberation, China implemented the pace of socialist construction.

Private enterprises were outlawed by state-owned enterprises, and *** became the country's largest employer.

After graduation, students will be sent to work in units without having to go through the labor market determined by the market to find jobs.

Strictly speaking, all workers working in state-owned enterprises are civil servants, and their jobs in the units are guaranteed for life. In addition to their monthly salary, they can still work even after retirement. Withdraw wages from the unit.

In order to ensure that everyone has a job, these state-owned enterprises often hire far more people than they need. As a result, these state-owned enterprises have a large number of redundant staff and severely reduce economic benefits.

Some people say that the work of state-owned enterprises is "thirty-six if you do it, and thirty-six if you don't do it." This means that workers can receive full wages regardless of their work performance.

At the same time, these state-owned enterprises do not have a salary system based on performance.

As a result, workers have no motivation to do a good job.

Although state-owned enterprises later established bonus systems to distribute bonuses to employees with good performance, it was not able to solve some basic problems, such as redundant staff and low efficiency.

Overstaffing and low efficiency are often related to the iron rice bowl. In addition, other problems caused by the iron rice bowl include workers’ over-reliance on employers or units, and workers’ Facing the dilemma of being unable to find another job