1. Essay (no less than 400 words) On the quality of Chinese people. I remember hearing a story many years ago. Chinese students in the United States invented a way to make international calls without paying, which is to use a thread to thread coins.

Go up and hit, throw it in and hit it, you can take it out again and throw it in again.

At that time, the unanimous conclusion was that only Chinese students would do such a thing, which would disgrace the Chinese people.

After so many years, I don’t know how many people will still remember this news.

Now, I am also living abroad, and I am also surviving. I think I am qualified to evaluate it now.

Before writing this article, I want to make something clear: I will completely refute this view.

Are morality and quality the same thing?

Is morality an educational issue or a personal issue?

When Bush announced air strikes and sanctions on Iraq, moral issues arose: Thousands of poor people in Iraq will be the victims of this war he launched, and the number one target, "Silly Mother," unless the air strike missiles can smell his scent

Otherwise it will have no effect at all.

When Bill Gates was developing software in the early days, his usual method was to buy software from some small companies under false pretenses, get the original code, then burn bridges, and then use other people's original code to develop his own software.

A victim of Gates' "unethical" tactics.

There are too many examples like this. If you look at the history of many celebrities, you will find that in the movie "Titanic", there are many people with aristocratic descent who are leisurely drinking coffee in the first class cabin and choosing between "morality" and "immorality".

"Immoral" nobles.

Bush and Bill are big celebrities, and their most common characteristic is "high quality."

Bush is from a well-known family, and Bill is a top student who was fired from Harvard University.

But they all did "immoral" things.

Oh my gosh, are they a little lighter than what Chinese students do in Canada?

The reason why Bill is praised more than criticized is because he used his wisdom, which is essentially different from stealing.

(Why do I suddenly say stealing? Because this is the bottom line of moral corruption. It is easier to explain clearly than it.) It is also a kind of wisdom to talk about the issue of Chinese students studying in the United States in a bigger way.

It is different from stealing. Anyone knows how to steal.

Even if you want to do these two things, you still have to ask "Hey, how do you do it?" - the difference is that one is technological wisdom and the other is life wisdom.

If someone says two things into a piece of great wisdom, one is greed for petty gains (then I have something to say again: Can the person who said this make a salary of more than 10,000 yuan a month: Long-distance calls are on IP cards

It was very expensive to make calls from phone booths at that time when there was no widespread use and the price of phone calls had not dropped (the price of a call from a phone booth in Germany is six marks per minute). What is a "big bargain"? What is a "little bargain"? Is it a business for everyone?

Everyone can get a million-dollar venture fund from Soros. As far as I know, there are many rich people who start from one copper coin to another... Billionaires save every copper coin. We call them "models", and some of their incomes are less than 500 yuan.

Ordinary Chinese people who have an income of more than 500 yuan should try their best to save ten yuan. When we call them twenty yuan, we call them "take advantage of small things and suffer big losses."

How could this starving man not drink a bowl of ginseng soup when he left?" People with similar incomes generally have the mentality of "I didn't get a small advantage, and I hope he suffers a big loss." I am currently studying in a public school in Germany.

I have heard of many ways to avoid train tickets. Some friends told me that moral standards are set by people and change according to the situation. I think it is necessary to put aside morality and talk about quality. As a Chinese international student, I went to Germany for a week.

I stepped on dog poop several times, and was surprised by the dog poop and cigarette butts scattered everywhere in Germany. I endured the continuous noise of sneezing in class, but for a long time, I never thought or heard "Well,"

The quality of Germans is very poor!" On international flights, 60% of those who refuse to listen to dissuasion and continue to smoke are Japanese. What's more, many Japanese websites have specially opened a special topic to explain how to hide on the plane.

In fact, in international universities, international students who dare to wear a pair of slippers in class are definitely Japanese. Many Chinese students in Germany feel that many Japanese students are not as good as Chinese, but they get more respect from Koreans.

They have become the most unpopular passengers on the plane because they like to eat Korean kimchi on the plane that is unbearable to others; Italy is a paradise for immigrants, and there is an amnesty every few years. What kind of quality is there? No one has ever heard of it?

: 1. The quality of the Japanese is poor. 2. The quality of the Koreans is poor. 3. Only Germans, Japanese, and Koreans don’t do self-criticism. When I first arrived in Germany, I met someone.

Chinese. We were walking home at 12:20 in the evening. When we passed an intersection, the street lights came on. Since it was late at night and there was no one on the street, I wanted to cross the road.